National Green Tribunal: Communication Will Be Considered Complete Even If The News Has Been Put In Public Domain

Must Read

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract....

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish...

Follow us

The National Green Tribunal, in this case, ruled that the petition will not be maintained as it is barred by time under Sec. 16 of National Green Tribunal Act whereas communication will be considered complete once the news has been put in the public domain

In the present case, the appellants filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 16 of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 to permit the filing of the application and condone the delay against the letter dated 25th January, 2018 issued by Ministry of Environment and Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of India, whereby environment clearance had been granted to M/s UltraTech Cement Ltd. for limestone mining at villages Kalsar, Dayal and Kotda Taluka Mahuva, District Bhavnagar, State of Gujarat.

It is the case of the applicant that although the environment clearance letter/order is dated 25th January 2018, the communication, which is necessary for the limitation to begin, is in fact not complete till date.

Since, the appellants are illiterate villagers and are not so well conversant with the internet, tried to find out about the environment clearance, with the help of some educated persons in the vicinity those who are computer literate, and tried to get a copy of environment clearance from the website of the project proponent, but could not find the same on their website. Therefore, the issue in the present case is which date should be considered as the date of communication and whether the Appeal is well within limitation or not.

Court’s Decision  

The court dismissed the petition as not being maintainable on account of being barred by limitation. The court in its judgement stated that EC granted on 25.01.2018 was very much uploaded by the Ministry on 29.01.2018 and was also downloaded on 30.01.2018. On the contrary, the appellant has only tried to explain, in general terms, the period that too only from 10.04.2018 onwards. The appellant has concealed material facts of EC being uploaded by the Ministry on 29.01.2018, the publication of EC in the newspaper by the respondent.

Therefore, it has no hesitation in holding that the grant of EC was in the public domain on 30.01.2018, if not on the earlier day. It is the duty of the appellant to explain each day of delay which prevented him with sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the prescribed period. The court carefully perused the averments made in the application for condonation of delay and said that the application neither gives any sufficient cause nor explains the same in respect of each day.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Filed Challenging the Judgment of Madras High Court in Ganesan v. State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

An appeal was filed before the Supreme court, challenging the judgment & order of Madras High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the HC judgment...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -