Meghalaya govt. fined by SC for failing to curb illegal mining

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

Supreme Court on July 3, 2019 decision ruled that Meghalaya state government should pay Rs. 100 crore Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for the restoration of the environment after allowing illegal coal mining in tribal areas of the state.

Facts of the case

Illegal mining has been a major concern for the Meghalaya government. Last year on December 13, an illegal mining operation in East Jaintia Hills district of Meghalaya lead to the deaths of 15 miners who were trapped underground inside the tunnels when water from nearby Lytein river flowed in claiming their lives. Since then, only two dead bodies have been retrieved making the whole tragic situation even worse with family members waiting for the return of their loved ones’ bodies.

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) had taken an unusually hard-line approach after such incidents which was reflected in its January 4 judgment whereby NGT ordered Meghalaya state government to pay CPCB Rs. 100 crores for failing to curb illegal mining operations. Meghalaya government appealed to the Supreme Court against this ruling claiming that paying such a huge amount would likely cause many hardships for the government as their state budget is not big enough to compensate such losses.

Court ruling

A Division Bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan and K M Joseph heard the instant case while deciding on many such appeals arising from NGT rulings. Apex Court declared, “State is always at liberty to obtain appropriate directions if aggrieved by any act of the committee” while deciding the jurisdiction of NGT. The top court held that NGT under the auspices of Rule 24 of National Green Tribunal (Practice and Procedure) Rules, 2011 has the authority to issue such fines and can also direct the setting up of a committee to decide on the transportation of the illegally mined coal at the mine site. The Court said, “NGT by directing for the constitution of the committee has not delegated essential judicial functions. The Tribunal had kept complete control on all steps which were required to be taken by the committees and has issued directions from time to time.”

Supreme Court acknowledged the state government’s problems and hence ordered Meghalaya government to transfer funds from Meghalaya Environment Protection and Restoration Fund (MEPRF) to CPCB to the tune of Rs. 100 crores so that state government may not be unduly burdened by any ‘hardships’ as claimed and yet the amount is also paid. CPCB can then utilise that amount in restoring the damages done through illegal mining operations. Apex Court stated, “Natural resources of the country are not meant to be consumed only by the present generation of men or women of the region where natural resources are deposited. These treasures of nature are for all generations to come and for intelligent use of the entire country.”

The top court in later parts of its judgment ruled that the Meghalaya state government should hand over all the illegally mined coals in its custody to Coal India Limited (CIL) as per the order issued by NGT. CIL then in consultation with Katakey Committee, set up as per NGT ruling should auction off the coals and handover the proceedings to the Meghalaya state government. The Apex Court advised that the state government should proceed with all the seized coals of illegal mining in accordance with Section 21 of the 1957 Act.

Impact of the judgment

This judgment is considered to have a positive impact on protecting the lives of poor miners as well as safeguarding the nation’s resources. As the Apex Court has rightly held that our natural resources are not ours to squander away as we owe our next generation a clean and healthy environment, so we should strive to protect our nation’s resources from the greed of unscrupulous officials encouraging unregulated mining operations. NGT had in its previous ruling suggested that the amount imposed on Meghalaya government as a punitive measure could be recovered by the state government from these unscrupulous people and it would serve as an effective deterrent in curbing illegal mining.

Supreme Court in its judgments had always championed the cause of poor and downtrodden populace of our country by protecting their rights and fighting for their safety. All the pioneering verdicts from the Apex Court in the last few decades have been found to favour the common man by bringing justice to the needy. This verdict like the few others are the laudable efforts of the top court in a country recently embroiled with a host of geopolitical challenges, financial woes and crumbling social mores.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -