Maharashtra Government goes to Supreme Court against Arnab Goswami

Must Read

Andhra Pradesh High Court: CRP Disposed; Parties Need to be Present Either Physically or Virtually

  The Single-Judge Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi decided the case...

Bombay HC Pursues a Case Regarding Payment of Interest on Delayed Payment of Taxes: Says the Interest to Be Levied on the Net Cash...

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only...

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Registration of Fir Does Not Construe Any Final Opinion About the Case

Hitesh Bhardwaj (Petitioner) has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The...

Allahabad High Court Directs University to Take Concerned Measures

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had decided the case Satya Prakash Tiwari & Others v. State Of U.P....

U.S. District Court Sentences NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere to 120 Years in Prison Over Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Charges

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicts NXIVM (pronounced “nexium”) founder, Keith Raniere, to...

Tripura High Court Provides Interim Relief to Prevent the Frustration of Object in a Writ Petition Alleging Error in NEET Scores

  In W.P(C) 720 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an interim relief prayed under a writ for...

Follow us

Maharashtra Government on behalf of the Deputy Commissioner of Mumbai (Zone III) has filed an application in the Supreme Court demanding to issue an order against Arnab Goswami to separate him from the investigation agency from any pressure or threat or coercion so that the investigating agencies could carry out a fair probe.

The application accuses Goswami of making the false and baseless allegations and publicly trying to malign the Mumbai Police and their manner of investigation.

Previous Order by the Apex Court

On 24th April, the Supreme Court granted interim protection from arrest for three weeks. Goswami had moved the apex court after over 100 FIR’s filed against him across Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, and Jammu and Kashmir.

The FIR filed accused him of making the “inflammatory statement” and defaming the congress interim Sonia Gandhi.

A bench of Justice D.Y Chandrachud and M.R. Shah granted him protection from 3 weeks and said no coercive action to be taken against him for 2 weeks.

The bench ordered staying of all the FIR’s against him, except the one at Nagpur.

The FIR filed at Nagpur was transferred to Mumbai for the investigation by Mumbai Police, along with the FIR filed by Goswami alleging that he was attacked by two goons on a motorcycle on 23rd April in the city.

The bench said that Court intended to protect the petitioner for 3 weeks and permit him to move anticipatory bail application before the Trial Court or High Court.

Application by the Maharashtra Government

The application filed by the Maharashtra Government claims that Goswami is taking advantage of his interim protection granted him by the court and cause subtle threats and intimidating the investigating agency.

The Application prayed for restraining him from doing such acts. The government also asserted that the Goswami has “used, abused, and misused” his power and position as a journalist or an editor.

The application states that the various threats had also been made on his organization’s Twitter account of Republic’s Hindi channel Republic Bharat alleging that the police were biased against the petitioner or the police are unnecessarily questioned him for several hours.

On his debate show “Puchta Hai Bharat” Goswami made a false allegation against the commissioner of Mumbai Police, stating that he had suppressed the Petitioner’s FIR.

It said Goswami mentioned “India Bulls Scam” on his show and claimed that several police officers including the commissioner were involved in it and he was going to investigate the same.

The application reads as the statements made in the debate on his channel are aimed at browbeating, terrorizing, and intimidating the investigating officer.

Application filed on behalf of Advocate Sachin Patil finally demanded the Hon’ble Court issue appropriate direction to maintain the balance between the rights of the petitioner as a citizen as well as a senior journalist and also of the investigating agency to investigate without any fear, threat or pressure.

The applicant also stated that the conduct of the petitioner which is marked with arrogance would be more or less encroaching upon the area of investigation. Because the principle of law, equity, and justice all are at stake.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Andhra Pradesh High Court: CRP Disposed; Parties Need to be Present Either Physically or Virtually

  The Single-Judge Bench of Andhra Pradesh High Court comprising of Hon'ble Smt. Justice Kongara Vijaya Lakshmi decided the case of Andhavarapu Swetha @ Tankala...

Bombay HC Pursues a Case Regarding Payment of Interest on Delayed Payment of Taxes: Says the Interest to Be Levied on the Net Cash...

  KLT Automotive and Tubular Products Limited filed a writ petition with the primary contention that interest is levied only on the net tax liability...

Punjab & Haryana High Court: Registration of Fir Does Not Construe Any Final Opinion About the Case

Hitesh Bhardwaj (Petitioner) has preferred the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The petition seeks appropriate directions to...

Allahabad High Court Directs University to Take Concerned Measures

The High Court of Judicature, Allahabad had decided the case Satya Prakash Tiwari & Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Higher Edu. Lko...

U.S. District Court Sentences NXIVM Founder Keith Raniere to 120 Years in Prison Over Sex Trafficking and Racketeering Charges

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York convicts NXIVM (pronounced “nexium”) founder, Keith Raniere, to 120 years in prison over...

Tripura High Court Provides Interim Relief to Prevent the Frustration of Object in a Writ Petition Alleging Error in NEET Scores

  In W.P(C) 720 of 2020, Hon’ble Justice S.G Chattopadhayay dealt with an interim relief prayed under a writ for correction of marks obtained in...

NGT Pulls up PMC, Asks to Shift Waste Processing Plant at Baner

  Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 27th October 2020, directed Pune Municipal Corporation (PMC) to close the plant and shift it to...

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -