Live-Streaming of Court Proceedings

Must Read

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Follow us

Facts:

The access to information is the nodal principle for creating transparency in the democratic functioning of any institution. The Right to Information was an exceptional piece of legislation to make information accessible to the citizens. The Parliamentary proceedings are duly recorded and live streamed for the citizens. The objective behind it is to empower citizens with adequate information to know the opinions deliberated upon several issues of public importance and understand the law-making process.

The Writ Petition recently filed in the Hon’ Supreme Court of India by Senior Advocate Indira Jaising moots upon the question of live-streaming or video-recording of matters listed in the Hon’ Supreme Court for ordinary citizens. The petitioner has filed the Petition with the objective to make the institution of Judiciary more transparent and retain the public trust and confidence in it.

The Petitioner has initiated the online petition of “change.org” petition with the similar objective to gain public support for the same. There are certain important highlights for live-streaming of the court proceedings:

  • The live –streaming of the proceedings shall be of the cases of Constitutional or National importance;
  • No violation of privacy as family/criminal/other related matters where there are countervailing interests of privacy would be in camera;
  • It would empower and provide access to ordinary citizens;
  • Live streaming would be an informative mechanism for citizens to also understand the justice delivery process;
  • Criticisms and appreciations of judgments would be more informed as the citizens would be able to understand the basis/ratio of the decision;
  • Courts would be accessible for young lawyers and law students to learn and understand the court proceedings helping them to develop better as a lawyer;
  • It would instill a sense of accountability to the Judges and create a more transparent institution;
  • Till the infrastructure is created, proceedings can be uploaded on the YouTube channel which will be cost-effective.

Issues:

Whether is it important to live-stream or video recording of the matters before the Hon’ Supreme Court of India?

Feasibility of the Idea:

The bid to make the judiciary more transparent has been gaining momentum since the Press Conference held by the four senior-most judges of the Apex Court. The Supreme Court last year directed the installation of CCTV cameras in the trial courts and tribunals of each State. The very same endeavor has been taken forward by the petitioner to apply the same principle of transparency to the Supreme Court. The petitioner has relied upon making live-streaming for matters that have constitutional/national importance as these matters are likely to affect the citizens at large. Also, to address the issue of violation of privacy the petition has been very unambiguous to restrict it whenever there are countervailing interests of privacy such as in matters of family dispute, criminal, etc.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -