Lawyers in Calcutta renew week long boycott

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Facts:

The facts involved the resolution adopted by the Bar Association of the Calcutta High Court calling all lawyers to cease their work till 05.03.2018. The resolution was adopted in the wake of the following events:

The members of the Bar Association, Bar Library Club, and Incorporated Law Society presented their concern to the Governor and the representatives about the vacancies in the High Court of Calcutta. According to the resolution, the representatives of the Governor in response assured the members of the three organizations that their concerns are duly addressed to the Hon’ Minister of Law and Justice and would be discussed with the Hon’ Chief Justice of India.

The members of the three organizations passed a resolution to cease all the judicial working till the 05.03.2018. The resolution was passed to mark protest against the authority for failing to take appropriate steps to address the grievances.

Issues:

The void in the Indian Judicial System caused due to the vacancies prevalent in the Courts.

Outcome:

The resolution marks the unquestionable commitment of the members of the legal fraternity to take a strong stand against the lackadaisical attitude of the appropriate authority to speed up the procedure of appointing judges in different courts. The pending vacancies do not only increase the pendency of the cases but simultaneously delays justice. In India, there are 403 vacant positions in the total 24 High Courts as on 01.02.2018. The numbers itself presents the state of justice delivery system in India.

The members of the three organizations took a bold step in initiating a step to present their displeasure towards the present state of affairs. The decision to cease work is a collective way of protest for a greater good. It is undeniable that it would not affect the citizens, but a hardline approach had been felt to pressurize the government and appropriate authorities to implement corrective measures. The members to have urged the Bar Council of different States to join hands and show solidarity towards the protest. There is no High Court in the country that does not face the challenge of long-pending judicial pendency. This way the legal fraternity would create a nationwide consciousness.

Judicial vacancies deprive the citizens to seek timely justice. There is a significant number of population languishing in jails waiting for their trial. The problem of undertrial prisoners is the biggest dark spot to the Indian Judiciary causing overcrowding in jails. Moreover, it violates their fundamental rights. The Supreme Court has laid down guidelines to protect the undertrials, but the unavailability of judges deteriorates the already prevalent sad state of affairs.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -