Jodhpur Court Sentences Asaram Bapu To Life Imprisonment Till Death For Raping A Minor

Must Read

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract....

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish...

Follow us

Looks like Asaram Bapu just ran out of blessings. The self-styled godman has been sentenced to life imprisonment till death by Jodhpur Court for raping a minor five years back. The decision was delivered in the makeshift courtroom at Jodhpur Central Jail where Asaram had been languishing since four years. Keeping in mind the widespread violence which occurred at the time of sentencing of Baba Ram Rahim Singh on similar charges, security had been increased in areas around Asaram’s ashrams. Security at Jodhpur Central Jail was also increased.

Facts of the Case

Victim studied in Asaram’s ashram in Chhindwara. When she fell ill her parents were informed that their child has been possessed by evil spirits and they should meet Asaram for remedy. On 14 August 2013, Parents took their daughter and travelled to Manai, Jodhpur to meet Asaram. On the night of August 15-16 parents of the girls were asked to leave the girl behind and move out of the ashram by Asaram. The prosecution claims it was then when the crime was committed. The girl was also threatened to not to share the events of the night with anyone. She narrated the happenings of the night to her father who tried to meet Asaram in Delhi but could not. Thereafter a zero-FIR was lodged against Asaram and his aides which was transferred to Jodhpur. Asaram booked in August 2013 and arrested a month later. His request for bail was rejected 6 times. 3 times in Rajasthan High Court and three times in Supreme Court.

Issues of the case

  1. Was Asaram and his aides were guilty of rape as defined under Indian Penal Code and other sections of POCSO(Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act and Juvenile Justice Act.

2.What should be the appropriate sentence for such a crime?

The decision of the Case

Asaram was charged under section 376 of Indian Penal Code, various section of the POCSO Act and Juvenile Justice Act. Special Judge Madhu Sudan Sharma, SC/ST Cases sentenced Asaram to life imprisonment till death and further handed a term of twenty years each to his two aides namely Sanchita alias Shilpi and Sharad Chandra and acquitted other two accused namely Prakash and Shiva were acquitted. Public Prosecutor Pokar Ram Bishnoi on the issue of quantum of sentence argued that being a trustee of a religious and educational institution, the way the accused sexually assaulted the victim as part of a conspiracy, there is need to give the strictest punishment in the case.

Followers of Asaram are deeply saddened by the decision. Father of the victim on other hand was satisfied with the verdict.

Learning of the Case

From this case, we learn that in a country governed by rule of law even godmen cannot escape the clutches of law. Law indeed has an extensive reach.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Filed Challenging the Judgment of Madras High Court in Ganesan v. State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

An appeal was filed before the Supreme court, challenging the judgment & order of Madras High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the HC judgment...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -