High Courts Shall Be Watchful Of Instances Of Misuse Of PIL: Supreme Court

Must Read

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s...

Follow us

Supreme Court of India once again warned High Courts about the menace of misuse of Public Interest Litigation. There have been instances in past where PublicInterest Litigation has been used by the litigants to fuel their own vested interests.

Facts of the Case

State of UP the respondent in the present case had filed a Public Interest Litigation in the Allahabad High Court praying that Hon’ble High Court issue a writ of mandamus directing the state government to establish new Tehsil building forTehsil Hasanpur Village Karanpur Mafi in the District of Amroha in Uttar Pradesh. Division Bench was observed that government had in fact granted funds for construction of new Tehsil Office Building for Hasanpur, District Amrohaand accordingly allowed the Petition. Aggrieved by this decision Petitioner filed a recall application which was rejected by the Learned High Court through an order dated 13.10.2017. Petitioner appealed against this order in theSupreme Court of India.

Petitioner contended that PIL filed by the Respondent was for his personal gain as the PIL sought construction of New Tehsil office building was at a new location which was closer to the area owned by the family of the respondent to jack up the property prices in that area. Respondent filed a counter affidavit which stated that the State Government had acquired a land for construction of new Uttar Pradesh decided to demolish the old building and construct a new one at its place. After the order of Learned High Court of Allahabad decision was taken to construct the new building at the new location.

The decision of the Court

Division Bench of the Supreme Court of India after listening to both the sides and going through the counter affidavit filed by the respondent ruled that “Petition which was filed in the High Court by the Respondent was not a genuine petition in Public Interest but was done to subserve the personal interest of the Respondent”   

The bench further said that it was crystal clear from the counter affidavit theState Government had decided to reconstruct the old building rather than transferring it and Later changed it to comply with the order of Allahabad High Court.

Bench observed that

Where a Tehsil building should be constructed is not a matter of High Court to determine in the exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. These of mandamus administrative matters and decision have to be taken by Uttar Pradesh. The High Courts must remain vigilant to funds for to misuse PILs to subserve extraneous and motivated purposes. Such efforts must be dealt with firmly.”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

Petition Filed in Delhi High Court Challenging the New Privacy Policy of WhatsApp

A petition has been raised before the Delhi High Court challenging the updated privacy policy of the instant messaging app, WhatsApp. It is accused of looking into the virtual activities of the users,

Bombay High Court Says Pleas Against the Rejection of Nomination Before the Polls Is Not Maintainable

Bombay High Court on Wednesday held that a candidate cannot challenge his nomination by filing a writ petition before a court prior to the polls after his nominations have already been rejected by the Returning Officer (RO) for the Panchayat elections of January 15.

Bombay HC: It Will Be Difficult if Civic Bodies Don’t Take Action on Illegal Constructions

The Bombay High Court said on Wednesday that if the Municipal Corporations do not take action on the illegal constructions, things will become very difficult. This observation was made by a bench comprising Chief Justice Dipankar Dutta and Justice Girish Kulkarni while hearing a PIL after the Bhiwandi building collapse on September 21st, 2020 which led to the death of 39 lives. Mumbai Thane, Ulhasnagar, Kalyan-Dombivli, Vasai-Virar, Navi Mumbai, and Bhiwandi-Nizampur corporations were filed as respondents.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -