Telangana High Court Summons the Director of Public Health to Appear Before Court

Must Read

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Follow us

The Telangana High Court on 13.07.2020 questioned the state government for not doing massive testing for Covid-19. Following a report in Times of India, it summoned public health director, Dr G Srinivasa Rao, to appear before the Court to explain the same.

Submission of the Petitioner

Vasudha Nagaraj, the counsel for the petitioner, presented her submissions. The government had agreed to rope in all the 34 teaching hospitals to treat patients. Several government hospitals have also been earmarked as Covid-19 hospitals. But people are still going to Gandhi Hospital only. The Gandhi authorities are not admitting all patients. They are only allowing those who come with a Covid-19 positive test certificate.

Prayer of the Petitioner

The petitioner, Dr R Srivatsan, prayed to the Court with a direction to the government. The prayer was to enlist teaching hospitals attached to state-run on COVID duty. He also prayed to enlist the teaching hospitals attached to private medical colleges.

Observation of the Court

The Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan heard the PIL. The bench also consisted Justice B Vjaysen Reddy.

The bench wondered how the government expected such activities from the Covid patients. It is not easy for them to rush from faraway places to Gandhi Hospital in an emergency. Thus, medical facilities were not available to them close to the places where they reside.

There is no point in designating government hospitals in districts as Covid-19 hospitals. The
Government also did not make them functional. A poor family from Adilabad cannot shift their loved ones in distress to Gandhi hospital. Therefore, state has to keep medical facilities available nearer to the patients.

Reference of the Interview of Former Health Secretary

The bench referred to Monday’s interview of Sujatha Rao. She was the former health secretary in Times of India. She spoke of fewer tests in Telangana. The CJ also wanted to know why the government was not able to do more.

Reference of the Case of Dr. Sultana

The Court dealt with another petition filed by Venudhar Reddy. It was questioning on the private hospitals charging exorbitantly. Even doctors are not spared from this fleecing. They referred to the case of Dr Sultana. In this case, a private hospital charged exorbitant fees from Dr. Sultana. The Court said that Private hospitals should rise to the occasion and extend a helping hand.

Decision of the Court

The Court summoned public health director Dr G Srinivasa Rao. He would appear before the Court for explanation on Covid-19 duty.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -