Madras HC: Organisers and Beneficiaries should strictly adhere to certain Norms for Distribution of Food and other Items during Lockdown

Must Read

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable...

Follow us

In the case of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam v. State of Tamil Nadu & Ors., through a petition, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, the principal opposition party in Tamil Nadu, had assailed the legality of a Press Release issued by the Information and Public Relations Department of the state requiring all such people/ organization, engaged in distributing essential commodities, to seek prior permission from the District authorities during the lockdown for COVID-19 crisis.

The press statement stipulated that the items for distribution to the public should be handed over to the Corporation Commissioner or President or Executive Officers or Block Development Officer of the Town Panchayats. It is presented by the Advocate General that often the organizers gather huge crowd during the distribution of food and other items, increasing the likelihood of spread of the disease.

Court’s Observations

The bench does not find any irrationality or arbitrariness in requiring the individual or group of individuals from seeking prior permission from the authorities concerned and it is very much essential that the organisers or the beneficiaries must strictly adhere to certain norms to regulate the distribution of food and other items. The court, however, held the other stipulation concerning handing over the items for distribution to the Commissioner or other instrumentalities of the Government did not arise. In view thereof, the following directions have been issued for distribution of food and other items:

  • The petitioner organisation or other similar organisation, non-governmental organisations, individuals or group of individuals shall intimate the District authorities concerned, as already notified by the government, 48 hours in advance before distribution of food and other materials to the poor;
  • As far as distribution of food is concerned, on receipt of such intimation, the Food Safety Officer concerned shall cause an inspection of the place where the food is likely to be distributed with respect to the health condition of the person (s) who is/are engaged in the preparation of the food as well as the quality of the food to be served. After the Food Safety Officer is satisfied with the above norms, the petitioner party can proceed with the distribution of food;
  • It is made clear that the preparation and distribution of food have to be effected within the zone, in respect of Corporation limits and within the police Station limits in rural areas. However, there shall not be any distribution of food within the areas earmarked as ‘hot spots’ by the Government;
  • It is further made clear that the distribution of the food has to be completed within a time to be specified. However, in case, if the distribution of food could not be completed within the time, the District authorities can consider extending the time on their discretion by one or two hours;
  • The place where the food is likely to be served has to be sanitised by the authorities concerned before effecting distribution so that it will be fit for such distribution of food;
  • The State can deploy police officials to regulate the recipient of food;
  • The State shall permit three organisers, excluding the driver, who organise the distribution of food, along with an elected representative, to be present at the venue;
  • More than three persons shall not travel in one vehicle to carry the food items to the place of distribution and they shall strictly adhere to the preventive measures announced by the Government in the exercise of powers under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;
  • The petitioner organisation or other similar organisation, non-governmental organisations, individuals or group of individuals shall strictly ensure that social distancing norm is followed during the distribution of food and there is no deviation, whatsoever;
  • It is well open to the District authorities to impose such other condition (s) that may be reasonable to ensure that the distribution of food is effected without deviation of any of the norms.

Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madras HC Reaffirms Trial Court’s Decree in Case of Thimmaraya & Ors. V. Gowrammal

A Civil Revision Petition was filed by three petitioners against the dismissal of their application on the file of the Sub-Judge, Hosur. The case...

Delhi High Court Disposes Ashok Arora’s Appeal Against Suspension From Supreme Court Bar Association

In the present Petition, Senior Advocate Ashok Arora challenged an Order passed by a Single Judge bench. The Order held that Mr Arora had...

Allahabad High Court Dismisses Application To Quash Prima Facie Allegations of Criminal Intimidation and Outraging Modesty

Allahabad High Court, on 17th November 2020, dismissed an application filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. and refused to quash the charge sheet (dated...

Delhi High Court Prohibits Gathering in Public Places To Celebrate Chhat Puja

The Order had come in a Writ Petition moved by Shri Durga Jan Seva Trust. The Petition sought to quash and set aside an...

Bombay High Court Directs State To Pass Tribe Claim Within Two Weeks, Refuses To Intervene on Merits of Claim Itself

The Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S.S. Shinde and Madhav Jayajirao Jamdar passed an order on 17th November 2020 in...

Kerala High Court Dismisses Petition by Allocating Respondent To Vacancy in IFS Cadre

On 16th November 2020, the Division Bench at Kerala High Court, consisting of Honourable Justice A.M. Shaffique and Honourable Justice Gopinath. P heard the...

AP High Court: If an Auction Is Conducted by a Cooperative Bank, the Property Ceases to be Property of the State

A single-judge bench consisting of honourable justice Ninala Jayasurya gave orders on the writ petition filed by the petitioner. The petition challenges the action...

Madras HC Rules in Favour of the Authorities in FMGE Examination, Finds Writ Petitions Against the Exam Void of Merit

Three aspirants of Foreign Medical Examinations moved to the High Court by filing a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. They...

Hong Kong High Court Rules for Independent Mechanisms To Be Set up To Deal With Complaints Against Police Officers

The present suit was brought by a journalist association because of the police brutality that the protestors faced in the protests against the China...

Madras High Court Maintains That Government Policy Is To Prioritize Own State’s Candidates and Sets Aside Nativity Certificate Rejection Order

Varsha Totagi, a NEET aspirant filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. She had been denied Nativity Certificate without which...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -