Telangana High Court Directs the Government to File Counter Affidavit Over UG and PG Examinations

Must Read

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Follow us

Telangana High Court on 09.07.2020 declined to pass an order to the state government to promote students of all degree and post-graduate courses to final year based on their marks in internal assessment exams.

Submission of the Petitioner

The counsel for the petitioner, C. Damodar Reddy appealed to the bench to promote all students of UG and PG courses to the final year. He submitted to promote them based on their internal assessment marks. Moreover, he stated that the governments of Punjab, Haryana, Maharashtra, and Pondicherry have taken such decisions.

Submission of the Respondent

The Advocate General raised contentions on behalf of the state. The Telangana government had decided to hold the examination of UG and PG courses. For conducting the exams, the state would follow the norms of the University Grants Commission (UGC). In this regard, the UGC issued Standard Operating Procedures (SOP). The dates of these examinations would be fixed in the future as per the SOP. But till such time, the examinations stand postponed.

Observation of the Court

The Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhanheard and Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy heard the two PILs. The previous hearing was on June 30. The Advocate General informed the HC that all common entrance tests were postponed. But the bench did not pass any specific direction on that day. Moreover, there was no decision of conducting exams of the UG and PG courses on the said day.

In this hearing, the Court observed that conducting examinations is a policy decision. The Courts cannot compel the state government to take a policy decision. The UGC through its SOP suggested postponing of the exams. However, this would only be done if the COVID-19 pandemic further aggravates. Further, a possibility exists that the state government would probably come up with a decision not to hold the exams in the coming days. Also, the Court does not know whether the conditions would improve or deteriorate. The coronavirus spread its tentacles fast in the state. The Court also relied on the cancellation of the exams by the National Academy of Legal Studies and Research (NALSAR) was unable to hold the exams.

The Decision of the Court

The Court directed the state government to file a counter affidavit in three weeks. The affidavit should contain the details over UG, PG Examinations.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -