Telangana Government Moves Supreme Court on the Matter of Krishna Water Diversion Plans

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

The Telangana Government has moved the Supreme Court seeking directions to Andhra Pradesh Government to stop the process of tenders for Rayalaseema Lift Irrigation Project (RLIP), one of the two components to divert about 8 tmc ft Krishna waters a day from Srisailam reservoir planned by A.P., in violation of the riparian rights of Telangana.

Officials of the Irrigation Department stated about the SLP. A Special Leave Petition (SLP) was filed through the e-filing system. It was filed on the issue by a team of counsel on behalf of the Telangana Government. They said it expected to be listed. They also said it would come up for hearing in a couple of days.

The SLP has been filed as decided at a meeting. Chief Minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao chaired the meeting on July 30. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the situation arising out of A.P.’s water diversion plans. They also discussed the KRMB directions to A.P. to stop the process of tenders of RLIP. They decided at the meeting that the Government would continue its relentless fight. The Government would try to stop the project (RLIP) under any circumstances.

The Telangana Government has brought to the Supreme Court’s notice. The notice was that the A.P. Government had set in motion its Krishna water diversion plans. The A.P. Court did not seek any approval from the KRMB and the Apex Council. The A.P. Court did not follow the A.P. Reorganisation Act in the matter of utilizing river waters. The A.P. Government had issued a G.O. (203) on May 5, 2020, specifying its plans to take up RLIP. The Court expanded Pothireddypadu to increase its water drawer capacity to 80,000 cusecs.

Further, Telangana has pointed out that the two plans of A.P. would enable it to draw over eight tmc ft of Krishna water every day. The Pothireddypaddu head regulator system can draw over five tmc ft of water every day. It was proved during the flood season last year. Practically, the water drawal capacity of Pothireddypadu is nearly 60,000 cusecs. Officially, it is 44,000 cusecs, according to a senior Irrigation Department official.
The water drawal capacity of Pothireddypadu was increased to 44,000 cusecs in 2007. Previously it was 14,000 cusecs. It was undermining the riparian rights of Telangana during combined A.P. itself.

Andhra Pradesh’s plans were in gross violation of the existing tribunal award. It has already utilized its entire quota of allocation. It tied up with various irrigation systems. Telangana said this in its petition. It has requested the Supreme Court to stop the tenders process for RLIP.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -