Students of Institute of Law, Nirma University Seek Directions From Gujarat High Court Against Arbitrary Fee Demands

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Nirma University in Gujarat has demanded full fees from the students. The students are seeking directions from the High Court under Article 14. The alleged demand for full fees amid COVID-19 is arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The spread of COVID-19 has put a halt on all physical activities of various institutions. However, educational institutions have provided for online classes amid the lockdown.

Nirma University issued a notification on 01.07.2020 detailing the current academic year. It stated that the learning process would begin from 06.07.2020 and payment of full fees by 05.08.2020. The ‘full fees’ would include all the charges levied during normal functioning.

On 27.05.2020, the University Grants Commission issued a circular. It suggested that all educational institutions should have a ‘considerate’ approach in matters of fee payment. The universities must recognize and address the financial hardships of students.

Thus, the students wrote to the Gujarat High Court seeking appropriate directions.

Contentions in the Petition

The petitioners have challenged the university notification dated 01.07.2020. It gave no due regard to the impact of the lockdown on the livelihoods of the stakeholders. If there is any reduction in costs, the benefit must be shifted to the students via fee reduction. Any non- compliance would lead to surplus earning for the university. If the institution indulges in profit-making, it shall go against the law.

The plea also defined the two aspects of the student-university relationship. First, the universities do not provide services for profit under commercial laws. Second, the students have little bargaining power giving certain leverage to the universities. Hence, this highlights the gaps in the education regulatory system. These gaps create negative impacts on the students and their families.

The plea places reliance on the apex court judgment in Modern Dental College v. State of Madhya Pradesh. The 5- judge bench asserted-

“a University cannot charge a fee that is beyond the purpose of fulfilling the object of education.”

Hence, education is not a business but a public good. Moreover, the Court has limited the scope of fees to the extent of operations and a reasonable surplus. Any income beyond this standard would be illegal in explicit terms.

Further, the plea states that the university has not considered any refund/ adjustment of the fees collected in the previous semester. Besides, the university claims an increase in costs during the online academic year. It will be illogical and irrational to the high price of the online methodology. In fact, it is the myopic approach of the university while dealing with the exigency.

The plea also provides for violations of fundamental rights. The lockdown has affected everyone in many ways. There are students’ families whose livelihoods were dependent on physical workspaces and transportation. They are affected in different ways than other students. The disproportionate impact shall relate to the ‘socio-economic class’- a relevant ground of equality before the law. It shall prima facie attract provisions of Article 14 of the Constitution. If university charges regular exorbitant fees during uncertain times, it will also violate the students’ right to access education as under Article 21.

Prayer for Relief

The students are seeking suo moto cognizance considering the gravity of the situation. The university notification must be stayed as it violates the fundamental right of the students. The Court may direct a proportionate reduction of fees. The university must also provide a detailed fee structure accounting for prevalent expenses. The Court may also pass any other order to avoid the unjust treatment to the students.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -