Madhya Pradesh High Court orders Continuation of earlier issued Directives for the functioning of Courts in Extended Lockdown

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

A circular was issued by Madhya Pradesh High Court to continue the application of guidelines as the lockdown was extended till 03.05.2020. The directives were initially issued on 25.03.2020 and 14.04.2020 owing to the disruption of court activities amid lockdown.

The order shall apply to the Principal Bench of the High Court at Jabalpur and Gwalior.

New Directives

After the announcement of extension of lockdown by the Ministry of Home Affairs, the High Court issue circular ordering extension of guidelines. With the balance of conveniences, the Court had to ensure justice as well as safety to its stakeholders.

Thus, following directives were issued including instructions on video conferencing and e- filling of urgent matters.

  1. Prohibition of entry in High Court: Entry in person to the Principal Bench at Jabalpur, Indore and Gwalior shall remain prohibited. All the administrative and judicial works are to be communicated through Registrar General on their official e-mail address.
  2. Prohibition of entry in Subordinate Court: Entry shall remain prohibited subject to specific permission of the District Judge/ Principal Judge of Family Court. The official communication must be made by the respective heads for wither administrative or judicial work.
  3. Registry officers and staff to be stationed at the respective place of posting: All the officers and staff of the High Court at Jabalpur, Indore and Gwalior benches shall be stationed to carry out urgent duties.
  4. Hearing of matters: Only matters for an urgent hearing shall be resented before the Court with due permission from Hon’ble Chief Justice in case of High Court or District Court and from Principal Judge, Family Court in case of Family Court or Subordinate Court. On receival of such permission, the litigant/lawyer shall be instructed of the venue and mode of communicating to the Court through video conferencing or otherwise.
  5. Staff members to maintain an active mode of communication: All the registry officers and staffs are instructed to keep their mobile phones or any other mode of communication in an active mode for receiving and discharging the duties as assigned by their respective heads.
  6. Adherence to the directives: The directives apprise all the concerned persons to adhere and abide by the directions and guidelines as issued by the Central and State Government. It reprimands against any kind of disobedience or deviation from the aforementioned directions.

In case of any exigency, the High Courts and Subordinate Courts are to function as per aforementioned directives unless any administrative decision being taken by the Chief Justice of the High Court.

Recent Developments

Subsequently, another circular was issued for the stringent application of these directives as the court witnessed overcrowding and violation of social distancing within the premises. The Chief Justice while expressing his concern, has directed to prohibit the physical presence of litigants and advocates in the courtrooms allocated to senior officials and staffs.

Although the advocates, the accused and other necessary parties are permitted entry to the Court, the advocates are now encouraged to conduct video conferencing from their residency and workplaces.

Relevance

As reported on 26.04.2020, an employee at the office of the registry at the Indore bench of High Court was tested positive along with his family. This was the first case of court official being detected positive of the infection. Thus, the Chief Justice has suspended the hearing of cases via video conferencing at the Indore bench with immediate effect. Hence, the following of directives must be of utmost importance to prevent any hazard out of the pandemic.

As per the order dated 02.05.2020, the Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court has extended the present guidelines with effect from 04.05.2020 to 17.05.2020 amid phase three of nationwide lockdown.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -