Plea in Delhi High Court to assign Tablighi Jamaat leader Maulana Saad’s case from the crime branch to National Investigation Agency (NIA)

Must Read

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were...

Follow us

The Petitioner, i.e a Mumbai-based Lawyer Ghanshyam Upadhye, has urged to transfer the case from Delhi Police to NIA.

The Petitioner says that despite enough time, the Delhi Police failed to arrest the leader. On 13-05-2020, Delhi Police opposed a plea in High Court to not assign the case of Maulana Saad for holding congregation in Lockdown to NIA. 

A Bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Anup Jairam Bhambhani, conducting the hearing through video conferencing asked the petitioner to place the judgments in support of his plea. 

Contentions by the Petitioner

Advocates Subhash Jha and Yash Chaturvedi representing Upadhyay claimed:

Delhi Police failed to arrest Maulana Saad even after giving an ample amount of time and Saad photograph being published in electronic media.

The plea claimed it is impossible for Maulana Saad to go underground for such a long time. It also claimed that the Delhi Police was incompetent to let Maulana Saad gather thousands belonging to Tablighi Jamaat in Delhi.

Further, media reports and evidence collected by the Delhi police states it is a conspiracy by Maulana Saad. His companion also supported him in spreading COVID-19 in different parts of the country. They had an ulterior motive of causing massive death all over the country.

On 31-03-2020, Delhi Police lodged an FIR against seven persons. It also included the rabbi, on a complaint by SHO of Nizamuddin Police Station. 

The Enforcement Directorate also filed a case against Maulana Saad, Trust links to Jamaat and others for Money Laundering. The plea states that the acts of omission and commission have done by Saad and his companion constitute “Terrorist Acts/ Activities” as defined under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). It stated that Tablighi Jamaat’s group aren’t only spreading the deadly virus in the country but also assaulting the Corona Warriors who have been treating the patients.

Statement of the Police 

Counsel (Criminal) Rahul Mehra and Advocate Chaitanya Gosain representing Delhi Police opposed the plea. They say that Delhi Police have been doing their investigation diligently. Furthermore, the Petitioner has no locus standi to file the plea. The Court will next take up the matter on May 28, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court : High Courts Have Sole Authority Under Article 226 To Decide Validity of Tax Provision, Even if Matter Is Sub-Judice Before Income...

A Full Bench of the Supreme Court held that the validity of a provision is a serious matter which could only be decided by...

Kerala High Court Rejects Writ Petition for Rejection of Loan Application

Case: Anvardeen. K v. Union of India. Coram: Justice P.V. Asha On 24th November 2020, The Kerala High Court involving a single bench judge of the...

Supreme Court: Maritime Board Must Not Wallow in Inaction and Be Arbitrary in Its Contractual Duties

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court held that a State instrumentality such as the Maritime Board is expected to act without any arbitrariness...

Supreme Court: Right to Property Is a Constitutional Right, the Essence of Rule of Law Protects It

A Division Bench of the Supreme Court has held that permitting the State to assert indefinite right upon one’s property, without any legal sanction...

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar To Issue Origin Certificates To Two Sisters in Two Writ Petitions

Two Writ Petitions by two siblings was filed under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petitions owed to the fact that they were...

Delhi High Court Directs Centre and Delhi Govt To Consider a PIL Seeking Paid Menstrual Leave as Representation

The Delhi High Court had provided direction to consider a petition as representation. The Central and Delhi governments were directed to consider the same....

Madras High Court Reiterates That ‘Ignorance of Law’ Is Not an Excuse and Dismisses Petition by a Constable

A Constable committed bigamy and deserted his service for more than 21 days. After dismissal from his service, he moved to Tamil Nadu Administrative...

Transfer of Winding-up Proceedings Allowed Under S. 434, Restrictions Under 2016 Rules To Not Apply: Allahabad High Court

This appeal relates to the question of transfer of winding-up proceeding from the High Court (Company Court) to the NCLT.  Facts M/s. Girdhar Trading Company, 2nd...

Constitutional Court of South Africa Declares Provisions of Domestic Workers’ Injury Compensation Legislation To Be Unconstitutional

The Constitutional Court of South Africa in Sylvia Mahlangu v Minister of Labour , declared parts of the Compensation for Occupational Injuries and Diseases...

Bail Granted Under Section 167(2) CrPC Can Be Cancelled Under Section 439(2) CrPC: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court held that the right of default bail of the Accused can be cancelled under Section 439(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Facts...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -