Patna High Court: Granting of Bail To Juvenile Against the Interest of the Juvenile

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

Criminal revision application filed against the judgment dated 21st September 2019 in a case registered under Sec. 414 of the IPC and 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act.

Facts of the Case 

Some people looted the petitioner’s house and the police recovered many articles, including a loaded pistol. The petitioner was currently staying in the Observation Home at Muzaffarpur. He was a juvenile as his age was 17 years 6 months and 10 days.

Petitioner’s Submissions

The counsel submitted that the Court must allow the petitioner’s release as he is a juvenile. He should be in the custody of his father.  The petitioner had received bail in 3 other cases. The counsel relied on the case of Lallu vs. State of Bihar. Here, the court said the gravity of the offence must not be a consideration for releasing a juvenile. In another case, the court ordered him to keep registering his attendance for one year. In the present case, the petitioner has been in the observation home since 16th May 2019.

Respondents Submissions

The counsel submitted that it is not in the juvenile’s interest to release him. The fact that a loaded pistol was in his possession showed that he wasn’t in the right company. The Social Investigation Report said that he would get back to his old ways if released. He was in the company of people much older than him. The Report mentioned that bail would expose him to physical and psychological danger. It was possible that he would associate with other criminals and commit other crimes. Other accused persons were also involved with the petitioner in the crimes.

Court’s Orders

The Court agreed with the submissions by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor. It was obvious that the petitioner would go back to his old ways if released. The Court was conscious of the juvenile’s interest in this case. It agreed with the proposition in the Lallu case which said the gravity of the offence should not be a factor.

But in the said case, the interest of the juvenile did not warrant bail. The Social Investigation Report confirmed the same.

The Court has taken into consideration that the juvenile has been in custody for some time. Yet, the report submitted to the Court confirms that the petitioner would go back to old ways if sent on bail. The juvenile was already in bad company and would continue to engage in it post the release. This would lead him to create bigger problems for himself. Being conscious is the responsibility of the court. Granting bail would be against the interest of the juvenile.

Hence, the Court dismissed the application. Expedition of the inquiry by the juvenile board initiated.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -