SimranDalvi

In this case, the Court considered the petitioner liable for the offences under Section 120B read with 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. As a result, the Court denied the anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Facts of the Case The co-accused, Pravin Kumar Singh acquired a

Criminal revision application filed against the judgment dated 21st September 2019 in a case registered under Sec. 414 of the IPC and 25(1-b)A, 26, 35 of the Arms Act. Facts of the Case  Some people looted the petitioner’s house and the police recovered many articles, including a loaded pistol. The petitioner

The petitioner filed a writ petition against the quashing of his Third Professional MBBS Part-II exam result. The respondent Government Medical College canceled the result of his four papers. The college did not evaluate these papers. Facts of the Case  The petitioner got admission in 2015 in the MBBS course

The petitioner had sought for pre-arrest bail for offences punishable under Sec. 341, 323,504, 506, and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. Along with section 4 of the Protection of the Children from Sexual Offences Act. Sec. 4 of the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act mandates a sentence

The Patna HC directed the Chief Secretary to fill up doctors’ vacancies in rural areas. They could do so by transfers or recruitments to fill vacancies in difficult areas. Facts of the Case The Court was dealing with petitions that challenged the State Government’s refusal to give incentives to doctors

The Patna HC granted bail on the condition that the applicant pays ₹15,000 towards the PM CARES Fund. This fund has been set up for relief activities from the Novel Coronavirus. Facts of the Case In the stated case, an informant along with the police force reached a very old

Petitioner Sam Utthan is a registered society for leprosy patients. They filed a writ application in the Patna High Court. Petitioner’s Submission They submitted that leprosy patients were not getting proper food and medical facilities. Their living condition had become miserable because of the lockdown. They were neither provided with

Due to the continuing effects of COVID-19 in and around Patna, a full bench decided on extending the date of operation for Interim Orders till May 18. Directions Issued The Bench comprising of Chief Justice Sanjay Karol, J. Dinesh Singh and Hemant Shrivastava directed, as follows: All Interim Orders passed

Patna High Court encouraged the State to consider appointing a Nodal Officer to deal with the pandemic. Adv. Parul Prasad filed a PIL to take forward NITI Aayog’s suggestion of the same, and the High Court passed the order. Brief Facts of the Case Mr Prasad made a prayer to

Patna High Court encouraged the state to consider appointing a Nodal Officer to deal with the pandemic issues.  NITI Aayog suggested this and Advocate Parul Prasad filed a PIL where the court passed the order. Mr Prasad made a prayer to the state government to follow the guidelines of NITI