Orissa High Court extends Interim Protection in all Anticipatory Bail issued by Courts till June 18, 2020

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

In the view of the ongoing nationwide lockdown due to the Novel Coronavirus outbreak, a division bench of the Orissa High Court has extended all interim protections given by the High Court or Sessions Courts, which are likely to expire on May 4, till June 18, 2020.

“Interim protection given in all the Anticipatory bail applications by the High Court or Session Courts for a limited period, which was expired on dated May 04, 2020, shall stand extended till 18th June 2020”, said the High Court order.

As almost the entire police force is engaged in ensuring enforcement of lockdown across the state, the High Court’s advisory, which would be in force till June 18, comes as a relief. The High Court also asked police personnel not to be in a hurry to arrest the accused without complying with the provision of Section 41 (A) [Notice of appearance before Police Officer] of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, till 18th June 2020.

However, the Court mentioned that it is not an interdict or a direction to curb the power of the police to arrest. Rather, it is an advisory issued given the present crisis. It has to be followed by the police so far as it is practicable and possible.

All the interim bail granted under Section 439 [Special powers of High Court & Sessions Court regarding bail] of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, are limited by time-frame specifying an expiry date, stands extended till June 18, 2020, subject to the condition that, on every 10 days from 5th June the defence counsel shall file a petition supported by affidavit before the competent Court in Session over the matter, to the effect that the person on interim bail is not abusing his/her liberty within the jurisdiction of the Court”.

The Court also put in abeyance, any orders of eviction, dispossession or demolition, anticipatory bail, parole, bail granted under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. etc till June 18, 2020.

In the order, it was stated that, in this face of the crisis, we are sincerely concerned with the plight of the citizens and the litigants, and we observed that there was a majority of poor in the State. It was further stated that these people are not in a position to come to the court in such a situation to seek legal remedies and the High Court does not want a rush of litigants in the Courts in contravention of the “Social Distancing” discipline.

The order also stated that “intending to ensure that the litigants and citizens do not suffer on account of their inability to approach the Court of Law, we propose to invoke our plenary power under Article 226 & power of Superintendence under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, our inherent power over the Criminal matters under Section 482 [Saving of inherent powers of High Court] of the Cr.P.C, our power of Superintendence over Criminal Courts under Section 483 [Duty of HC to exercise continuous superintendence over Courts of Judicial Magistrates] of Cr.P.C and our inherent power over the Civil matters under Section 151 [Saving of inherent powers of the code] of the CPC.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -