Notice Issued To TRAI and Government for Sudden Stoppage of Aircel Services by Madras High Court

Must Read

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Follow us

Madras High Court issued a notice to Telecom Regulatory Authority of India(TRAI) and Government for suddenly preventing Aircel from operating in South India. This move comes after a PILwas herd in Madras High Court requesting the court to issue direction for the resumption of Aircel telecom services in Tamil Nadu as soon as possible.

Facts

G.Saravanakumar the petitioner in above mentioned Public Interest Litigation approached Madras High Court requesting the court to issue directions to resume the services of Aircel in Tamil Nadu. Petitioner had been a loyal and satisfied customer of Aircel since past 10 years. On 21st February with any prior information services of Aircel came to a sudden standstill across Chennai. He later came across a statement released by the head of Aircel informing him that that out of nine thousand mobile phone network towers owned by firms only two thousand and five hundred were operational and working. Remaining six thousand five hundred could not be used in spite of being in working capacity due to default in the payment of rent by the company. This led to widespread disruption in services of Aircel across the State.

The common folks of the state suffered immensely as disruption of Aircel services made it very difficult for them to avail welfare and government schemes such as LPG connections as mobile numbers listed in such services were not working. Petitioner submitted that more than 25 lakh subscribers have been affected in Chennai by the sudden stoppage of telecom and data services by the cellular company. This is highly unethical and should have been viewed seriously by the government and Trai. Moreover, Petitioner also submitted that around 8 lakh subscribers of Aircel have already applied for mobile portability which could not be completed due to a sudden stoppage in services of Aircel. Sudden stoppage of Aircel services have left certain people with no other means of connectivity Furthermore, this move of government and TRAI have made it impossible for dissatisfied customers to port their existing numbers to another mobile operator. Despite repeated complaints and inquiries no action has been taken submitted the petitioner. The main issue in the above-mentioned petition is that:

Is it allowed and ethical for TRAI and government to suddenly stop services of a telecom provider causing hardship to common people?

The decision of the Case

The court issued a notice to Trai and Government and set March 19th as the date for Trai and Government to file their counter reply.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -