NIA Probe Challenged In Bombay High Court By Two Accused in the Elgar Parishad Case

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

The human rights lawyer and the writer-activist accused in Elgar Parishad case approached the Bombay High Court. They alleged the transfer of probe from Pune Police to the National Investigation Agency (NIA) as ‘politically motivated’.

Brief Facts of the Case

A coalition of 260 non-profit organizations organized the event called as Elgar Parishad. This was organised on 31.12.2017. The event commemorated 200th anniversary of the Battle of Bhima- Koregaon. This was at the Shaniwarwada Fort in Pune.

The victory was vital to the Mahar Dalits. It signified their victory over Brahmin Peshwas. Hence, the event was based on the anti-caste theme.

 On 01.01.2018, violence broke out at the event. The Pune Police arrested several persons under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). It also claimed the speeches during the event partly responsible for the violence.

Soon after, the Police arrested some high-profile activists and lawyers, it alleged their active links to the CPI (Maoist), a threat to national security. The charge sheet mentioned the event as ‘creating communal disharmony’. 

 In November 2019, the elected government in Maharashtra had to re-examine the case. However, transfer of the probe to NIA was immediately done after BJP lost state elections. Advocate Surendra Gadling and Activist Sudhir Dhawale challenged the move on 19.06.2020.

Contentions by the Petitioner

The petitioners contended the transfer to be arbitrary, unjust and discriminatory. That, it violated Article 14, 20 and 21 of the Constitution. 

The Central Government passed the order on 24.02.2020. The gap between the police investigation and decision taken was 750 days. According to Section 6(3) of the NIA Act, the Centre could exercise such powers within the statutory period of 15 days.

Hence, they claim the order to be a fraud on the legislature and in sheer abuse of the statutory mandate. Further, it suffers illegality on account of the doctrine of waiver and promissory estoppel. 

Further, the petitioners claim it as a ‘political expediency’ and unreasoned order. The Centre passed the order only after BJP failed to form the government in Maharashtra. It may avoid the humiliation of being exposed to the manipulated investigation. Moreover, it does not specify the reasons for transferring the investigation. Thus, the State Police’s investigation was deemed  satisfactory for one and a half year.

The plea states the order as ‘interference with the administration of justice’. It cannot order a de-novo investigation into a matter in cognizance of the competent Court. It did not make out any case of bias or malafides before the Court.

The petitioners also challenged the territorial jurisdiction of Additional Judge, Pune and demanded a transfer of the probe which is contrary to Section 13 and 22 of the NIA Act. 

The petitioners have not received copies of electronic evidence despite the Trial Court orders. They said that NIA might indulge in procuring fabricated evidence. Hence, there is an urgent need to restrain NIA from any further investigation.

Prayer for Relief 

The petitioners filed the matter under Article 226 of the Constitution. As well as Section 482 of CrPC.

The Petition seeks the Bombay High Court to quash the impugned order dated 24.01.2020 which transfers probe to NIA. 

The Court may set aside the order passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Pune to transfer the records and proceedings. Moreover, the Court may grant an interim injunction to restrain NIA from carrying out any investigation. 


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -