Maternity leave of 180 days is petitioner’s right as per Allahabad HC

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

Allahabad High Court granted petitioner’s request and directed District Basic Education Officer, Bijnor, Uttar Pradesh to allow petitioner her full six months maternity leave.

Facts of the case

Petitioner Anshu Rani has been working as Anudeshak since 2013 at Purwa Madhyamik Vidyalaya Gowali Noorpur, District Bijnor. Petitioner applied for maternity leave on 26.09.2018 to the District Basic Education Officer, Bijnor. She was granted 90 days maternity leave from 01.10.2018 to 29.12.2018 with honorarium against the 180 days which she had claimed. No reason was given to her for curtailing her leave period by half.

Frustrated by the apparent inaction the petitioner approached the Allahabad High Court for redressal of her grievance. Avadesh Pratap Singh learned counsel for the petitioner pointed towards the provisions of the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 which was amended in 2017 (Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017). Advocate Singh contended as per the provisions of the amendment of 2017 maternity leave have been extended from 8 weeks to 26 weeks and the petitioner is entitled to avail the same.

Court ruling

After hearing the arguments of both sides the Court opined, “the maternity leave is social insurance. The maternity leave is given for maternal and child health and family support.” Allahabad High Court also stated “in consonance with the provisions of Article 42, Parliament has made the Maternity Benefit Act, 1961. Since Article 42 specifically speaks of “just and humane conditions of work” and “maternity relief, the validity of an executive or administrative action in denying maternity benefit has to be examined on the anvil of Article 42 which, though not enforceable at law, is nevertheless available for determining the legal efficacy of the action complained of.”

The Court particularly mentioned the visions of economic and social justice that were enshrined in the Preamble of our Constitution, specifically in Article 14 and 15 that guarantees all citizens of our country equality and equal protection of the law without any discrimination as to race, sex, caste, religion and place of birth. The Court ruled that from the perusal of the Section 5 of Maternity Benefit Act, 1961 and the policy of the Central Government to grant child care leave which is also followed by the State governments including State of UP, it is evidently clear that “the female employees of the State of U.P. are entitled to the benefits of the maternity leave as contained in the Maternity Benefit Act 1961 as amended by the Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017.”

Placing their reliance on the case of Dr. Rachna Chaurasiya Vs. State of U.P. and others passed in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No.24627 of 2017 the Court “directed the State Government to grant maternity leave to all female with full payment of 180 days, irrespective of nature of employment, i.e., permanent, temporary/ad hoc or contractual basis. State-respondent was further directed to grant Child Care Leave of 730 days to all female employees.” The Court thus ruled in favour of the petitioner and issued the mandamus granting her prayers of “maternity leave with honorarium with effect from 30.12.2018 to 31.3.2019.”

Impact of the judgment

The Court in their judgment drew references of numerous other cases where the same issues were discussed. The Supreme Court had ruled “to become a mother is the most natural phenomena in the life of a woman. Whatever is needed to facilitate the birth of the child to a woman who is in service, the employer has to be considerate and sympathetic towards her.” It is correctly held by our courts that “family as a social institution is considered as a backbone of the society.”

Our culture, beliefs, and traditions long since have worshipped the Divine Mother and have always held that women represent the spiritual epitome of that divinity. International Human Rights Law also upheld the dignity of women and her family should be given due protection. It was mentioned in 2017 judgment of Kerala High Court that “if on any reason she could not attend her workplace due to her duties towards the child (compelling circumstances), the employer has to protect her person-hood as “mother”. If not that, it will be an affront to her status and dignity.” Time and time again in matters of social justice our courts have always stood by the side of aggrieved victims and protected their rights from being usurped by corrupt forces of the society.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -