Man Acquitted 14 Years after Death by Bombay High Court

Must Read

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Follow us

In a perfect example of justice delayed but not denied, Bombay High Court decides a 20 years old criminal case by acquitting the accused posthumously after 18 years.

Facts

On 21st November 1998, an employee of Maharashtra State Electricity Board Mr. Balasaheb Jagtap confronted a conductor about a complain he had lodged against him at state transport bus stand in Satara. It was alleged that Jagtap had punched the conductor which led to bleeding from his head. Trial Court in the year 2000 found Jagtap guilty of causing hurt and imprisoned him for a term of three months and the same was affirmed by the Sessions Court in 2004. Jagtap left for his heavenly abode in 2004 while the matter was still pending in the Sessions Court. On a special request, his son was granted the permission to carry forward the petition. Son of Balasaheb Jagtap appealed against the verdict of the Sessions Court in Bombay High Court. Following was the main issue before the High Court.

Issues

Can legal heirs of the accused appeal against conviction order after his death?

Judgment and Proceedings

The prosecution submitted that both the subordinate courts had upheld the conviction. Defense Counsels Advocates Dilip Bodake and Umesh Yadav brought to the attention of the court that there was no independent eye-witness of incident in-spite of it happening in a public place. It was also submitted that according to the medical report, the injury was caused by a hard and blunt object and keeping in mind the job of the victim, he could have injured himself by falling off the bus. Furthermore, it was also discovered that the conductor was caught misappropriating the money charged for tickets from passengers because of which he was dismissed from the service.

Bombay High Court after listening to both the sides acquitted the accused and directed that if any fine was paid by accused same should be returned to the family of the accused. The Hon’ble judge Justice Prakash Naik said that in light of the animosity between the complainant and the accused, and the contradiction in the evidence, a doubt was created about the allegations. The trial court ought not to have convicted the accused of the offense. Furthermore, The Court also added that under section 394 of the Criminal Procedure Code, every appeal in a criminal case abated on the death of an accused. An exception occurs if an appeal is filed against a conviction, then within 30 days of the death accused, a close relative can seek permission to continue the appeal.

Learning of the case

From this case, we learn that under section 394 of Criminal Procedure Code allows a person to be acquitted even after his death provided his near relatives continue the proceedings.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -