Madras High Court: Mere Apprehension of Spread of Coronavirus not enough to Stall Newspaper Publication

Must Read

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract....

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of...

Follow us

The Madras High Court on Thursday stated ‘a vibrant media’ is an asset for any democratic country and refused to stall booklet of newspapers after dismissing a plea that challenged the exemption given to print and electronic media from the national lockdown aimed to arrest the unfold of the Novel Coronavirus. A department bench comprising Justice N. Kirubakaran and Justice R Hemalatha said ‘mere apprehension or least possibility’ approximately whether or not the sickness may unfold through newspapers can’t be a floor to restrict their e-book as it would amount to a contravention of the Fundamental Rights, of not simplest the writer, editor but additionally the readers.

The suggestion for the petitioner relied upon the studies research that said that Coronavirus might persist up to four to 5 days and 24 days in paper and cardboard medium respectively. He said that once superior nations are suffering to control the unfold of the virus, the developing USA like India must not go through due to the circulate of the newspapers, as there’s a probability of spreading of the virus. However, Additional Advocate General PH Aravind Pandian submitted that research on this region changed into very constrained and no longer final.

“If there is the possibility of spread of virus not most effective via newspapers sources, even with the aid of the movement of money virus could be unfolded,” he stated and went on to factor out that Dr T Jacob John, Professor of Virology at Christian Medical College, Vellore had stated that spread of virus thru newspapers or papers is a least.

While disregarding the petition, the courtroom stated that the petitioner’s studies have been performed in international locations like Germany and UK and there too the Governments had not prohibited the e-book of newspapers and confused that initial researches and inside the absence of sufficient information, newspaper book could not be stalled. The courtroom also discovered the significance of the media in a democracy and that any try and restrict or limit the guide of newspapers would amount to the muzzling of independence of media even as also distinguishing between information and reviews.

“What is predicted is handiest the information and no longer the perspectives of the publisher,” the court emphasized. “News, as it is, must be delivered to the readers and no longer the perspectives of the publishers or his ideology. Though they’re entitled to position forth their ideology, humans want handiest the information as it stands. Mixing of perspectives and beliefs need to be averted. However, it’s miles a reality that some of the publishers are mixing their perspectives together with the news.”


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the...

Bombay High Court Refuses Interim Relief to Doctors Alleging Arbitrary Placement at Government Hospitals for One-Year Mandatory Public Service

The Bombay High Court was hearing a plea against the arbitrary placement of doctors for a mandatory period of one year. The petitioners prayed...

Uttarakhand High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Relief for the Cancellation of Selection Process

On 13th October 2020, a Single Judge Bench of Hon'ble Justice Lok Pal Singh, heard the case of Ashish Bisht & Anr. v. State...

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against National Stock Exchange For Lack Of Merit

In the case of A. Kumar v. Financial Intelligence Unit & Ors., A. Kumar filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

The Federal Appeals Court Holds Trump’s Diversion of Military Funds To Build the Wall To Be Unlawful

The Federal Appeals Court held that US President Donald Trump’s diversion of military funds to build the wall is unlawful. A grey area in the...

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Filed Challenging the Judgment of Madras High Court in Ganesan v. State Represented by Its Inspector of Police

An appeal was filed before the Supreme court, challenging the judgment & order of Madras High Court. The Supreme Court upheld the HC judgment...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -