Madras HC: Former CISF Official’s Appeal Dismissed Over Compulsory Retirement Order

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

Jagannathan, a CISF official was made to retire compulsorily by an order passed in 2018. He has appealed against the same by filing a Writ Petition. The matter was heard and decided upon by the bench comprising of Hon’ble Chief Justice A. P. Sahi and Hon’ble Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy.

Facts of the Case

In the present case, the appellant joined Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) in 1989. He was issued a charge of memorandum in 2012. The first charge being possession of unaccounted money while being deployed in the ‘B’ shift duty from 13.00 hours to 21.00 hours on 03.09.2012.

The second charge being refusal to comply with the instruction to remove his shoes and the act of swallowing the currency note after taking it out from his socks.

The third charge being continued acts of misconduct and indiscipline despite being charge sheeted and penalised on three previous occasions for having over stayed, found sleeping on duty and misbehaving with his senior. The Appellant, Mr. Jagannathan submitted a reply dated 17.09.2012. 

An enquiry was instituted on these charges. The Disciplinary Authority, after their investigation, awarded the punishment of compulsory retirement from service with full pension and gratuity benefits to the Appellant. This award was appealed against in front of Deputy Inspector General, CISF who in turn confirmed the order of the Senior Commandant, CISF. 

The Appellant filed a revision petition against the order by the appellate authority. It was rejected as the Appellant did not make any new points. 

The impugned order in 2018, decided by a High Court Judge, who re-affirmed the orders passed by the Disciplinary Authority, the Appellate Authority and the Revision Authority. 

Arguments Before the Court

The Counsel for the Appellant submitted that since the time Appellant joined CISF in 1989, till 2012, he has had a good performance. 

As regards the said charges, he submitted that Constables are permitted to have a sum of Rs.50/- as pocket money on any given day. The Appellant had spent a sum of Rs.30/- on 03.09.2012. During that shift, it was alleged that the Appellant was in possession of unaccounted money and that he swallowed a currency note by removing it from his socks.

The learned Counsel submitted that the Appellant did not swallow the currency note and that it was unnecessary for him to do so. There was no evidence that the Appellant possessed unaccounted money and, therefore, the charges were not duly proved.

As regards the prior acts of indiscipline, the counsel further submitted that these were minor acts of indiscipline such as over staying and sleeping on duty. The Appellant was unable to defend himself adequately against the charges because the charge memorandum was in the Hindi language.

Although, the Appellant requested the Enquiry Officer to provide a translated version of the charge memorandum, the Enquiry Officer refused to do so. The Counsel also went on to argue that the punishment was grossly disproportionate to the offence. The Appellant was compulsorily retired from service regardless of the fact that he had served the CISF for at least 23 years as of the date of the charge memorandum. 

The Counsel for the Respondents would submit that the appellant being part of CISF, by the nature of the services CISF provides, requires its employees to meet the highest standards of discipline. The counsel maintained that the principles of natural justice were complied with. 

Further, the Counsel with regard to the charge memo being in Hindi and the Enquiry Officer refusing  to provide a translated copy of the charge memo, submitted that the Appellant was conversant in Hindi language and was in a position to read the charge memo. The Counsel maintained that the appellant had also participated in the enquiry proceedings and cross-examined the witnesses. 

Court’s Observations

The Court observed that it does not sit in appeal over such disciplinary proceedings. The Court further noted that the charges were of possession of unaccounted money; refusal to remove his socks when instructed and instead swallowing the currency note; and continued acts of indiscipline.

The Court maintained that during the course of enquiry, the witnesses were deposed. On that basis, the charges are yet to be duly proved. The Court observed that it does not test the quality or sufficiency of evidence except to the limited extent of assessing whether the order was perverse. In the present case, the Court observed that the impugned order was not perverse. 

Further, with regard to the proportion of punishment being awarded, the Court noted that it was entirely within the purview of the Disciplinary Authority. In the present case, the Court does not find the punishment awarded to be grossly inordinate as opposed to the charges. 

The Court placed reliance on B.C. Chaturvedi v. Union of India, (1995) 6 SCC 749 to substantiate its stance. 

Court’s Order

The Court dismissed the Writ Petition. 

Click here to read the judgment.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -