Madras HC Directs District Election Officer To Ensure Free & Fair Elections To Co-Operative Societies

Must Read

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition...

Follow us

The Madurai Bench Justices M. Sathyanarayanan and P. Rajmanickam decided on two writ petitions, both filed against the same set of respondents. The petitioners filed writ petitions under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a writ of Mandamus. They sought for the respondents to conduct free and fair elections (as per the law) according to Rule 52(A) of Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rule, 1988. 

Brief Facts

In the first Writ Petition, Prabhu, the petitioner, claimed that he is a practising advocate. He is also a member of Madurai Taluk Agricultural Production Co-operative Marketing Society. The elections of Office Bearers to the society had been scheduled and cancelled on three separate occasions on account of public order. The respondents had again issued a new election notification which was attached along with the petition.

In the second Writ Petition, A. Selvaraj, the petitioner, claimed to be an agriculturist. He is also a member of Melur Agricultural Production Co-operative Marketing Society. The election schedule was announced by the respondents in October 2018, which was cancelled. The election schedule was again announced in December 2018, for which the petitioner had submitted his nomination. This again got cancelled. Currently, the respondents had again issued an election schedule that was attached to the petition.

Arguments before the Court

The counsel appearing for both the petitioners was Mr. M. Jegadeesh Pandian. 

In the case of first Writ Petition, of Prabhu, he submitted that elections could not take place on the previous three occasions due to law and order problem. Rule 52(A) of the Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Rules, 1988 creates a statutory binding on the respondents to ensure that the elections take place in a free and fair manner.

Pursuant to this, the counsel also submitted a representation dated 21.09.2020. He further apprehended that the present election schedule that was announced, is also likely to get cancelled similar to the previous three occasions. The counsel thus pleaded for appropriate orders be issued from the Court.

In the case of second Writ Petition, of A. Selvaraj, the counsel argued that the election is repeatedly getting postponed on account of law and order. It is obligatory on the part of respondents to oversee that the elections are conducted in an impartial and fair manner. The counsel, similar to the first Writ Petition, submitted a representation dated 17.09.2020, further apprehending that elections will see a postponement once again. 

The Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents, accepted the notice. He has forwarded the written communication of the first respondent (Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies / District Election Officer) to the Assistant Commissioner of Police. The counsel also submitted a communication dated 22.09.2020 addressed to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur (Law and Order). The counsel further argued that mentioned police officials had been informed about the apprehensions of the petitioner. Concerns raised by the petitioners in both the Writ Petitions had been attended and addressed. The counsel, therefore, contended that the Writ Petitions be dismissed.

Court’s Observations

The Court took the communications produced by the counsel for the respondents into the record. 

Court’s Decision

The Court directed the first respondent, i.e., The Deputy Registrar / The District Election Officer, to ensure that the elections to both the societies are conducted in strict compliance of the law. The Court also stated that the election process must be video recorded the cost of which are to be incurred by The Secretary / The Election Officer.

The Court further directed the Assistant Commissioner of Police and the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur to provide adequate protection to those who are conducting the election of Office Bearers to the societies mentioned in the petition. Both the Writ Petitions stand disposed of.

Click here to view the original judgement


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

SC: Under-21 Convicts Can Be Given Less Than Minimum Sentence, Resorts To Probation of Offenders Act

The Supreme Court resorted to the Probation of Offenders Act to sidestep the mandate under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code that mentions a sentence of not less than 7 years to those convicted of armed robbery, to give a chance to two young convicts to reform their lives.

Environment Protection Act Passed at the Instance of Foreign Powers: NHAI in Karnataka HC

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) claimed in a submission that the Environment Protection Act 1986 was passed not only for the protection of the environment by the parliament but also at the instance of foreign powers. This statement was made while referring to a UN conference and got the NHAI into great trouble in the Karnataka High Court.

Delhi High Court To Implement a Hybrid System Through Virtual and Physical Hearing

On Friday the Delhi High Court said that they have initiated steps to implement a mode wherein hearing can be done by virtual as well as physical mode. The Delhi High Court is aiming to implement the Hybrid mode. It stated that when the particular bench is conducting a virtual hearing the lawyer may opt for this mode after giving prior intimation about the same.

Mercy Plea of Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case To Be Decided in Four Weeks, TN Governor To Supreme Court

Tamil Nadu Governor Banwarilal Purohit on Thursday told the Supreme Court that a decision on the mercy petition of one of the convicts serving a life sentence for the assassination of former Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi, AG Perarivalan will be taken within four weeks. The petition has been pending with the Governor since December 30, 2015.

Bombay High Court Questions FIR Over Journalist Alleged of Communist Comment on WhatsApp

An FIR lodged against the editor of Marathi newspaper, Rajkumar Chhajed has been questioned by the Bombay High Court. The Maharashtra Police has accused Chhajed of creating a rift between the two communities based on a WhatsApp message.

Allahabad High Court Expresses Dissatisfaction on Counsels Seeking Unnecessary Adjournments

The petition had been filed by Smt. Radha prayed to issue directions to Judicial Magistrate-I in Faizabad. The petition sought a speedy decision in...

[Delhi Riots] When the IT Ministry Calls Us, We Will Go Says Harish Salve To Delhi High Court

The Vice President and Managing Director of Facebook, Ajit Mohan told the Supreme Court that when the representatives of the company are called by the Information Technology Ministry they will come and record their statements.

Allahabad High Court Seeks Response on Compensation of Cutting Trees From National Highways Authority of India (Nhai) 

The Order had come in the form of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by a bunch of law students in Uttar Pradesh. The...

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -