Madhya Pradesh HC Hears Plea Challenging NLSIU’s Decision to Conduct NLAT 

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

A CLAT aspirant has challenged the decision of the National Law School of India to hold a separate entrance exam. It is alleged that the impugned notification violates Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

Brief Facts

The Consortium of National Law Universities conducts the Common Law Admission Test (CLAT) every year for aspiring law students. A total of 22 National Law Universities accept the CLAT scores for the admission procedure. Including, one of the top-notch institutions National Law School of India University, Bangalore.

Owing to the pandemic, the authorities had to postpone the exam dates several times beginning from June 2020. With the relaxation of the lockdown guidelines, the Consortium is set to conduct a centre-based test on September 28, 2020. The applications for the same were closed on August 15, 2020.

However, on September 03, 2020, the National Law School of India, Bangalore announced that it would conduct its own home-based online entrance exam on September 12, 2020. The scores shall be considered for undergraduate and post-graduate courses offered by the institute.

Therefore, the petitioner has challenged the institution’s notification to be illegal, arbitrary and whimsical. 

Contents of the Plea

The petitioner has the locus standi as an aggrieved party under Article 226 of the Constitution. The plea has been filed at the Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The plea states that the impugned notification is in violation of Clauses 15.3.3. and 15.7 of the Bye-laws of the Consortium of NLUs. The clause mandates the member-institute to admit the CLAT score and ensure meritorious admissions. Moreover, the later clause pertains to the procedure for the voluntary withdrawal of the member institution.

Further, the decision was made after the aspirants filed their applications for CLAT 2020. This violates the principle of promissory estoppel as the institute has breached the legal relationship arising out of the unequivocal promise. In addition, NLSIU is a government-funded statutory institution. Therefore, creating a class by having a differential set of procedure shall be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. It shall infringe the petitioner’s fundamental right to take an examination in a just and fair manner.  

The plea also raises concerns for the technical requirements in a home-based test. The aspirants shall require supporting devices, operating systems, bandwidth speed of 1 MBPS, camera resolution and microphones among several other things. The requirements are arbitrary and against the doctrine of reasonableness. Moreover, aspirants residing in rural and suburban areas shall face hardships to fulfil the requirements. Hence, they shall be deprived of an equal opportunity to pursue law in one of the best law schools of the country.    

Prayer for relief

The petition seeks Madhya Pradesh High Court’s directions to quash the impugned notification and declare it to be illegal and arbitrary. The NLSIU may also be directed to follow the procedure established by the Consortium of National Law Universities. Further, the Court may also grant an ad-interim stay on the operation of the notification until the Court resolves the matter.   


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -