Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Petitioner Detained in POSCO Case

Must Read

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Follow us

On 24th July 2020, Justice P.N.Desai heard the case of Lokesh v. the State of Karnataka, via video-conferencing. The Court granted bail to the petitioner as the evidence against him were not supportive to bar him from granting bail.

Facts of the Case

The complaint was filed by Kalyankumar (brother of the minor victim) on 05.02.2020 alleging that the petitioner went to Kittur Ranichannamma School at Kolhar where the victim girl was studying in 7th standard. The petitioner informed the school authorities that the minor’s uncle had sent him to bring her. Hence, the minor girl met the petitioner and went out of the school.

The petitioner lured the victim girl and travelled in an auto-rickshaw. He held the hands of the victim girl and forced her to marry him as he loved her. The victim girl raised various questions about her maternal uncle. She asked the reason for making her travel to that place. She also stated that she will inform the about the behaviour of the petitioner to her parents. The petitioner threatened and assaulted the victim girl. 

The petitioner ran away from the spot when passer-bys found victim girl where she narrated the complete incidence. The brother of the victim girl lodged the complaint and hence, the police have registered the case in Crime No. 10/2020.

Arguments of Petitioner

The learned counsel for the Petitioner argues that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There are no grounds to specify that the petitioner has committed any offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life. 

As per the school records, the girl left school with her own consent and the petitioner signed the school register. It is not a case of procurement of minor for a sexual purpose. The victim girl self voluntarily came with the petitioner. The contents of the complaint are different from the statement of the victim girl before the investigating officer.

Arguments of the Respondent

The learned counsel for the respondent argued that the offences alleged against the petitioner are heinous in crime. It was falsely stated to the victim girl that her maternal uncle was waiting for her. The victim girl asked him to inform her parents, but the petitioner threatened her. If the petitioner is released on bail, he may commit a similar offence and also tamper with the prosecution evidence.

Court’s Analysis

The court said that the bail is the rule and the committal to jail is an exception. the school records clearly indicate that the girl herself gave letter seeking permission for one hour stating that she has to go to Kolhar. The register indicates that the petitioner has signed the register. The offences of the petitioner are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.

The petitioner has made out grounds to enlarge him on bail. He is not required for any investigation and no recovery is to be done. 

Court’s Decision

The Court allowed the bail application. The applicant was to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for ₹50,000. the petitioner must meet the following conditions:

  1. The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses. 
  2. The petitioner should furnish his permanent residence proof or change of address in any to the committal court.
  3. The petitioner shall not commit similar offences of which he is accused or commission of which he is suspected.
  4. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court on all the dates of the hearing unless he has prevented by genuine reasons.
  5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the concerned Court, without permission of the jurisdiction Court, till the disposal of the case.

The prosecution is free to move the Court for cancelling the bail if he violates conditions.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -