Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Petitioner Detained in POSCO Case

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

On 24th July 2020, Justice P.N.Desai heard the case of Lokesh v. the State of Karnataka, via video-conferencing. The Court granted bail to the petitioner as the evidence against him were not supportive to bar him from granting bail.

Facts of the Case

The complaint was filed by Kalyankumar (brother of the minor victim) on 05.02.2020 alleging that the petitioner went to Kittur Ranichannamma School at Kolhar where the victim girl was studying in 7th standard. The petitioner informed the school authorities that the minor’s uncle had sent him to bring her. Hence, the minor girl met the petitioner and went out of the school.

The petitioner lured the victim girl and travelled in an auto-rickshaw. He held the hands of the victim girl and forced her to marry him as he loved her. The victim girl raised various questions about her maternal uncle. She asked the reason for making her travel to that place. She also stated that she will inform the about the behaviour of the petitioner to her parents. The petitioner threatened and assaulted the victim girl. 

The petitioner ran away from the spot when passer-bys found victim girl where she narrated the complete incidence. The brother of the victim girl lodged the complaint and hence, the police have registered the case in Crime No. 10/2020.

Arguments of Petitioner

The learned counsel for the Petitioner argues that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. There are no grounds to specify that the petitioner has committed any offence punishable with death or imprisonment for life. 

As per the school records, the girl left school with her own consent and the petitioner signed the school register. It is not a case of procurement of minor for a sexual purpose. The victim girl self voluntarily came with the petitioner. The contents of the complaint are different from the statement of the victim girl before the investigating officer.

Arguments of the Respondent

The learned counsel for the respondent argued that the offences alleged against the petitioner are heinous in crime. It was falsely stated to the victim girl that her maternal uncle was waiting for her. The victim girl asked him to inform her parents, but the petitioner threatened her. If the petitioner is released on bail, he may commit a similar offence and also tamper with the prosecution evidence.

Court’s Analysis

The court said that the bail is the rule and the committal to jail is an exception. the school records clearly indicate that the girl herself gave letter seeking permission for one hour stating that she has to go to Kolhar. The register indicates that the petitioner has signed the register. The offences of the petitioner are not punishable with death or imprisonment for life.

The petitioner has made out grounds to enlarge him on bail. He is not required for any investigation and no recovery is to be done. 

Court’s Decision

The Court allowed the bail application. The applicant was to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for ₹50,000. the petitioner must meet the following conditions:

  1. The petitioner shall not tamper the prosecution witnesses. 
  2. The petitioner should furnish his permanent residence proof or change of address in any to the committal court.
  3. The petitioner shall not commit similar offences of which he is accused or commission of which he is suspected.
  4. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court on all the dates of the hearing unless he has prevented by genuine reasons.
  5. The petitioner shall not leave the jurisdiction of the concerned Court, without permission of the jurisdiction Court, till the disposal of the case.

The prosecution is free to move the Court for cancelling the bail if he violates conditions.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -