Karnataka HC Upholds the Tribunal’s Award in the Road Accident Case

Must Read

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Follow us

On 19 August 2020, Justice N.S. Sanjay Gowda heard the case of Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Ltd. v. Srinivasa, via video-conferencing. The Hon’ble High Court upheld the compensation amount to the respondent as awarded by the Hon’ble Tribunal.

Facts of the Case

The insurance company has appeared before the Hon’ble High Court challenging the award of Rs. 96,800/- awarded to the complainant. The claimant was walking near the gate of Vishwanathenahally village of Holalkere talk. The rider of Hero Honda motorcycle dashed into him.

Claimant’s Argument Before the Tribunal

The complainant sustained grievous injuries due to the accident. Hence, the claimant claimed for the compensation of loss due to the accident. The claim was contested by the owner as well as the insurer.

Insurer’s Argument Before the Tribunal

The claimant was travelling as a pillion rider in-vehicle bearing registration no. KA-16-6676 for which there is no valid insurance. Hence, the claimant had brought the vehicle bearing registration no. KA-16/Q-1928 as an offending vehicle because it carries valid insurance.

Tribunal’s Award

The accident occurred when the Hero Honda motorcycle bearing registration no. KA-16/Q-1928 collided with the claimant. Hence, the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 96,800/- to the claimant.

Arguments of the Appellant

The learned counsel for the Petitioner argues that the MLC register was produced by the insurance company. The register indicated that the Doctor recorded the offending vehicle as the Motor Cycle bearing registration no. KA-16-6676. The Claimant had brought Hero Honda Motor Cycle bearing registration no. KA-16/Q-1928 as the offending vehicle.

The vehicle registration number in the register is different from the offending vehicle. The insurer of the motorcycle with registration no. KA-16/Q-1928 cannot be made liable. The vehicle was not involved in the accident in question.

There was a delay in lodging FIR. This delay doubts the involvement of the vehicle. Hence, the Tribunal ought not to have awarded the compensation.

Arguments Made by the Petitioner

The learned counsel for the Respondent argues that there is no jurisdiction for interfering with the award.

Court’s Analysis

According to the MLC register, the vehicle bearing registration no. KA-16-6676 was involved in the accident. The motorcycle with registration no. KA-16/Q-1928 was brought by the claimant.

The doctor made an entry in the Medico-Legal Case on the basis of information supplied to him. The doctor must be summoned and examined and evidence is extracted from him that the vehicle bearing registration no. KA-16-6676 was involved in the accident. Till the time the doctor is not summoned, the insurance company cannot take shelter under the entry made in the MLC register.

The delay in filing FIR cannot be a conclusive factor regarding the occurrence of an accident. Under the Motor Vehicle Act, the Tribunal is required to come to its own conclusion regarding the occurrence of the accident.

Court’s Decision

The Hon’ble High Court held as follows:

  1. There was no accident which involves the vehicle Hero Honda motorcycle with registration no. KA-16/Q-1928.
  2. MLC register is for the purpose of enabling the doctor to comply with the requirement of informing the police. The registered cannot be considered as substantive proof of involvement of a particular vehicle.
  3. The Tribunal was justified in coming to the conclusion that the said motorcycle had been involved in the said accident.
  4. There is no doubt in the finding that the vehicle Hero Honda motorcycle with registration no. KA-16/Q-1928 was involved in the accident.

Hence, the appeal was dismissed as the Hon’ble High Court finds no substance in the arguments advanced by the learned counsel of the Appellant.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -