Karnataka HC quashes charge sheet exercising its Discretionary Power under Section 482 of Cr.P.C

Must Read

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector &...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court,...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first...

Follow us

The criminal petition was filed before the High court of Karnataka, Kalaburgi bench under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to quash the charge sheet in Crime No.135/2018 of Jewargi Police Station for the offences Punishable under sec.123 of Representation of People Act and 171 (C) (F) & 188 of IPC and consequently quash all further proceedings arising out of the said charge sheet and also grant such other reliefs as this Court deems fit was allowed.

Brief facts of the case

The complaint was filed on Veeresh /petitioner who was carrying cash more than the limit of election guidelines ie 50,000/- during the election period. On 12.05.2018 in the midnight at about 2.30 a.m. when the cop who was patrolling on duty in connection with Assembly Elections in the State, noticed Veeresh/ petitioner standing near the Government Urdu School in the town of Jewargi. Starting enquiring him about his identity and checked him when he noticed that the petitioner was in possession of cash of `52,050/- without any documentation supporting to the possession of the said cash. The cop drew an inference that it is violation of the election guidelines and that he was possessing the said cash to distribute the same to the voters, he summoned two panchas and drew a panchanama by seizing the said cash and brought the petitioner along with cash and also panchanama to the jurisdictional police and lodged the complaint under Sections 171C, 171F and 188 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 123 of Crl.P.No.201192/2019 Representation of People Act.

Arguments before the Court

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that even assuming for a moment that the petitioner was found in possession of said cash with him on an alleged day, still in the absence of any material to show that petitioner was in possession of the said cash only to distribute the same to the voters or bribing in any manner, the alleged offences cannot be attributed.

Per contra, the learned High Court Government Pleader in his argument submitted that as per the standard procedure issued to the Electoral Officer that an individual cannot possess a cash more than `50,000/- for the purpose of election without any documentation, as such, the complainant has rightly apprehended the petitioner and a prima facie case has been made out by the cop, which requires the police to subject him for trial.

Decision of the Court

There was no proof that the petitioner was either acting as an agent or as a party worker or at least was in possession of any electoral material including posters, banners etc. As such, initiation of the complaint and the charge sheet does not make out necessary ingredients to proceed further in the matter and to compel the petitioner to face a full-fledged trial; the matter deserves interference by the Court by exercising the discretion under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. in quashing the criminal proceedings instituted against the petitioner. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.

[googlepdf url=”https://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Veeresh-case_watermark.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Doctrine of Proportionality Must Adhere to Reasonableness Principal Test: Madras High Court

Young Men's Christian Association built a commercial complex and leased it without having due permission. The District Collector & Tahsildar issued a show-cause notice...

Delhi High Court Refuses To Stay Release of ‘The White Tiger’ on the OTT Platform Netflix

A plea requesting a stay on the release of the film ‘The White Tiger’ by the American producer, John Hart Jr. alleging copyright violation was rejected by the Delhi High Court on Thursday.

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being imposed.  Brief facts of the case This...

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...

“Consensual Affair” Cannot Be Defence Against the Charge of Kidnapping of the Minor, Sentence Reduced in View of Age Difference: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the appeal against the conviction under the charges of kidnapping and discussed whether the punishment was to be enhanced or not.   Brief...

Delhi HC to Municipal Corp: Paucity of Funds Not an Excuse for Non-Payment of Salaries and Pensions

The Delhi High Court ruled that the paucity of funds cannot be an excuse and pulled up municipal corporations for not paying salaries and pensions to their employees as the right to receive payment is a fundamental right guaranteed in our constitution.

US Supreme Court Reinstates Restriction on Abortion Pills

The Supreme Court of the United States granted the Trump administration’s request to reinstate federal rules requiring women to make in-person visits to hospitals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -