Karnataka HC allows Anticipatory Bail Petition for Branch Manager of Karnataka Grameen Bank in Funds Misappropriation Case

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

A criminal petition is filed by Jagannath Kulkarni and Revanappa under section 438 of criminal procedure code praying to release the petitioner on bail for the Offences Punishable under sections 409 and 420 Of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Facts of the case

Revanappa /Accused No.1 was the Branch Manager of Karnataka Grameen Bank, Aurad Branch from 15.05.2017 to 28.01.2019. He was suspended on 29.01.2019 for some lapse in his duty. Thereafter one Srinivas was posted as manager of the said branch. After taking charge, it came to his notice that there were no records in respect of loan transactions of 12 persons. Further, Madappa, a customer of that branch had approached on 23.08.2019 to make an enquiry about the outstanding amount on his account. He noticed that a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- was transferred from his account to another account on 22.10.2018. In this regard he gave a complaint, alleging that he had neither issued any cheque or transferred the amount and he denied his signature on the withdrawal challan. Thereafter, one M. Guruprasadrao was appointed to make enquiry and he visited the branch and gave report stating that without there being any documents, fake crop loans were credited in the name of 12 persons by misusing power by the accused colluding with other persons, who are officials in the same branch and have withdrawn 17.55 lakhs. Thus, they misappropriated the funds and cheated the bank. On a complaint lodged by one Sahebgouda Mulimani, Regional Officer of Karnataka Grameen Bank, the aforesaid case came to be registered.

Arguments

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are innocent and if any lapse has occurred, the petitioners’ alone can not be held responsible. They submit that both the petitioners have been suspended and there is no question of petitioners interfering with the investigation and tampering the documents. They submit that incident is alleged to have taken place in the year 2017 and there is an inordinate delay in lodging the complaint. The petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation. If they are arrested then the irreparable loss will be caused to them. Accordingly, they seek to allow petitions.

Per contra, the learned Government Pleader submits that investigation is still under progress. While the petitioners were in-charge of the bank, in the course of the transaction of the bank they have misappropriated huge amount by colluding with each other. He submits that petitioners have cheated the bank and withdrawn money using ATM cards and also using POS Machine. An amount with interest to the tune of 14.74 lakhs, have to be recovered from the petitioners. Accordingly, he seeks to reject the petitions.

Court’s Order

It is not in dispute that both the petitioners have been suspended. Therefore, it cannot be said that, if relief of anticipatory bail is granted they would tamper the records of the bank. It is also brought to the notice that out of Rs.14.74 lakhs a certain amount has been returned by the borrowers. If lapses are committed by the petitioners in the course of business transaction, whether the said lapse have been committed intentionally or whether there was an element of cheating, have to be looked into in course of investigation. Hence, by imposing suitable conditions, court deem it appropriate to grant relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly,  the petitions are allowed under certain conditions.

  1. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the Investigating Officer within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall execute personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One-Lakh Only) each with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
  2. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 shall co-operate with the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of investigation.
  3. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly and shall not hamper the case of the prosecution in any manner.

[googlepdf url=”https://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Karnataka-High-court-allows-petition-in-granting-anticipatory-bail-for-Branch-manager-of-Karnataka-Grameen-Bank-in-the-case-of-misappropriation-of-funds-.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute cases like the above one.

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -