Karnataka HC allows Anticipatory Bail Petition for Branch Manager of Karnataka Grameen Bank in Funds Misappropriation Case

Must Read

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Follow us

A criminal petition is filed by Jagannath Kulkarni and Revanappa under section 438 of criminal procedure code praying to release the petitioner on bail for the Offences Punishable under sections 409 and 420 Of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Facts of the case

Revanappa /Accused No.1 was the Branch Manager of Karnataka Grameen Bank, Aurad Branch from 15.05.2017 to 28.01.2019. He was suspended on 29.01.2019 for some lapse in his duty. Thereafter one Srinivas was posted as manager of the said branch. After taking charge, it came to his notice that there were no records in respect of loan transactions of 12 persons. Further, Madappa, a customer of that branch had approached on 23.08.2019 to make an enquiry about the outstanding amount on his account. He noticed that a sum of Rs.7,00,000/- was transferred from his account to another account on 22.10.2018. In this regard he gave a complaint, alleging that he had neither issued any cheque or transferred the amount and he denied his signature on the withdrawal challan. Thereafter, one M. Guruprasadrao was appointed to make enquiry and he visited the branch and gave report stating that without there being any documents, fake crop loans were credited in the name of 12 persons by misusing power by the accused colluding with other persons, who are officials in the same branch and have withdrawn 17.55 lakhs. Thus, they misappropriated the funds and cheated the bank. On a complaint lodged by one Sahebgouda Mulimani, Regional Officer of Karnataka Grameen Bank, the aforesaid case came to be registered.

Arguments

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are innocent and if any lapse has occurred, the petitioners’ alone can not be held responsible. They submit that both the petitioners have been suspended and there is no question of petitioners interfering with the investigation and tampering the documents. They submit that incident is alleged to have taken place in the year 2017 and there is an inordinate delay in lodging the complaint. The petitioners are ready to co-operate with the investigation. If they are arrested then the irreparable loss will be caused to them. Accordingly, they seek to allow petitions.

Per contra, the learned Government Pleader submits that investigation is still under progress. While the petitioners were in-charge of the bank, in the course of the transaction of the bank they have misappropriated huge amount by colluding with each other. He submits that petitioners have cheated the bank and withdrawn money using ATM cards and also using POS Machine. An amount with interest to the tune of 14.74 lakhs, have to be recovered from the petitioners. Accordingly, he seeks to reject the petitions.

Court’s Order

It is not in dispute that both the petitioners have been suspended. Therefore, it cannot be said that, if relief of anticipatory bail is granted they would tamper the records of the bank. It is also brought to the notice that out of Rs.14.74 lakhs a certain amount has been returned by the borrowers. If lapses are committed by the petitioners in the course of business transaction, whether the said lapse have been committed intentionally or whether there was an element of cheating, have to be looked into in course of investigation. Hence, by imposing suitable conditions, court deem it appropriate to grant relief of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly,  the petitions are allowed under certain conditions.

  1. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 shall appear before the Investigating Officer within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall execute personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One-Lakh Only) each with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer.
  2. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 shall co-operate with the investigation and shall appear before the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of investigation.
  3. Petitioners/accused Nos.1 and 2 shall not tamper with the prosecution witnesses either directly or indirectly and shall not hamper the case of the prosecution in any manner.

[googlepdf url=”http://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Karnataka-High-court-allows-petition-in-granting-anticipatory-bail-for-Branch-manager-of-Karnataka-Grameen-Bank-in-the-case-of-misappropriation-of-funds-.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute cases like the above one.

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -