J&K High Court Orders Accused Officers in Jawahar Rozgar Yojna Scam To Approach Trial Court for Release of Seized Amount

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On 14th September 2020, Justice Sanjay Dhar heard the case of Mst. Haleema And Others vs State Of J&K & Ors, via video-conferencing. In the absence of the record of the charge sheet, the Court could not adjudicate upon the present case. Therefore, it directed the petitioners to approach the trial court again.

Facts of the Case

The Central Government introduced a scheme called “Jawahar Rozgar Yojna” for the creation of assets in the rural areas of the erstwhile state of J&K. The Rural Development Department of the Government was entrusted with its implementation. The officers and the officials of the same misused their position to swindle huge amounts. Therefore, various cases were registered by the Vigilance Organization, Kashmir which led to the presenting of a challan before the Special Judge Court for Anti-corruption. During the investigation, certain bank accounts were frozen. On 21st September 1993, the learned Special Judge, Anti-corruption passed a restraint order against the contemplated disbursement of amounts. Some of the accused succeeded in getting the amount released by virtue of various orders passed by the learned Special Judge, Anticorruption. Further, these orders were challenged before this Court by virtue of nineteen separate Revision Petitions.

This Court allowed these petitions on 20th October 2000 and set aside the order of the learned Special Judge, Anticorruption. Furthermore, it directed the learned Special Judge to reconsider the matter in the light of material collected by the Vigilance Organization. On 16th June 2009, the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Anti-corruption considered the matter. The judge dismissed the petitioners’ applications in the order. It is this order which has been challenged by the petitioners through the medium of the instant petition.

Arguments of the Petitioners

The learned counsel for the petitioners argued that nothing incriminating has been brought on record. Thus, nothing would disentitle the petitioners from claiming the amount of FDRs belonging to the petitioners. It is further contended that the amount sought to be released is not remotely connected with the embezzled amount.

Court’s Analysis

It is noted that the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Anticorruption, Srinagar declined to release the amount in favour of the petitioners. This was on the ground that some of the petitioners are accused in the main/supplementary challan. On the other hand, some others figure in the annexures to the supplementary challan which contains the list of non- existent persons. The parties placed a record before this record. However, it does not reveal the particulars and details of the persons figuring in the annexures to the supplementary challan. Further, it does not reveal the particulars of the persons falling in the list of accused in the main challan and the supplementary challan. For deciding the controversies raised, the record of the charge sheet placed before the learned trial court needs to be examined. However, the summoning of the record for disposal of the instant petition will lead to a delay in the progress of the trial. In these circumstances, the only option available with the Court is to give liberty to the petitioners to approach the trial court once again for the release of the seized amounts.

Court’s Decision

The Court directed the petitioners to approach the trial court for seeking the release of payment orders/CDRs/FDRs. Further, the trial court shall be at liberty to take a view in the matter on its own merits in view of the change of circumstances, if any, without getting influenced by the impugned order.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the Court. Follow us on Google NewsInstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -