Rupa Veena S

Chandigarh Housing Board Is Bound To Implement the Chandigarh Administration’s Policy Decision: Punjab & Haryana High Court

On 15th October 2020, Justices Jaswant Singh and Sant Parkash heard the case of Bhartendu Sood vs Chandigarh Housing Board & Anr., via video-conferencing. Deeming the petition to be devoid of merit, the Court dismissed the Writ Petition. Facts of the Case On...

Jammu and Kashmir High Court Partially Allows Appeal and Modifies Order Passed by Single Judge Bench in a Construction Case

On 7th October 2020, Justices Ali Mohammad Magrey and Rajnesh Oswal heard the case of Pinky Gupta & Anr. vs Building Operation Controlling Authority & Anr., via video-conferencing. The Court partly allowed the appeal and directed the Single Judge...

J&K HC Quashes Order Passed by J&K State Human Rights Commission on Grounds of Lack of Jurisdiction

On 28th September 2020, Justices Rajesh Bridal and Justice Javed Iqbal Wani heard the case of State of J&K through Principal Secretary, Home Department vs J&K State Human Rights Commission and Ors, via video-conferencing. The Court quashed the Order...

J&K HC Reiterates Importance of Adherence To Technical Requirements of Preventive Laws

On 28th September 2020, Justices Rajesh Bindal and Rajnesh Oswal heard the case of Sartaj Ahmad Allie vs. State of J&K and others, via video-conferencing. The Court quashed the Detention Order. Further, it reiterated the importance of following the...

Jammu & Kashmir HC Orders Srinagar Development Authority To Repay Deposited Amount With Interest on Cancellation of Letter of Intent

Facts On 21st September 2020, Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey heard the case of Fida Ahmad Dar vs. Srinagar Development Authority & Ors., via video-conferencing. The Court allowed the Writ Petitions and quashed the notice issued by Srinagar Development Authority. The Respondents invited...

Jammu & Kashmir High Court Reiterates that No Man can be Condemned Unheard

On 22nd September 2020, Justices Ali Mohammad Magrey and Sanjay Dhar heard the case of Showkat Ahmad Mir vs Union of India and others, via video-conferencing. The Court allowed the appellant’s Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) and ordered the respondents...

J&K High Court Issues Directions to District Magistrate on deciding Property Possession Case

On 15th September 2020, Justice Sanjeev Kumar heard the case of Ejaz Ahmad Tak vs Union Territory of J&K and others, via video-conferencing. The Court gave certain directions to the office of the District Magistrate in passing the order. Facts...

J&K High Court Orders Accused Officers in Jawahar Rozgar Yojna Scam To Approach Trial Court for Release of Seized Amount

On 14th September 2020, Justice Sanjay Dhar heard the case of Mst. Haleema And Others vs State Of J&K & Ors, via video-conferencing. In the absence of the record of the charge sheet, the Court could not adjudicate upon...

Delhi High Court Orders Handover of Property in Family Dispute

On 10th September 2020, Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva heard the case of Dr Jai Mala Jain & Anr. v. Dr Ashwani Jain, via video-conferencing. The Court ordered the respondent to handover the possession of the subject premises. Facts of the case The parties,...

J&K High Court: Custody in One Case Cannot Be Counted for the Purpose of Another Case

On 9th September 2020, Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey and Justice Sanjay Dhar heard the case of Mohammad Amin Illahie and others vs. Union Territory of J&K, via video-conferencing. The Court rejected the bail application as the appellants did not...

About Me

48 POSTS
0 COMMENTS
- Advertisement -

Latest News

“Anganwadi Centers to Be Reopened Outside the Containment Zones, Which Is to Be Decided by the State”: Supreme Court

This case concerns the reopening of the Anganwadi Centers after they had been closed due to the lockdown being...
- Advertisement -

“Credit Facilities Being Granted by the Primary Agricultural Credit Society to the Non-Members Is No Longer Illegal”: Supreme Court

This Case concerns the dispute relating to the grant of tax exemption under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act, 1961.  Brief facts of the...

Back Wages of Labourers is a Question of Facts Depending Upon Various Factors: Gujarat High Court

The petition has been filed by workmen and employer against an award dated 23.04.2009 passed by the Labour Court, Bhuj in the case of...

WhatsApp Messages Would Have No Evidentiary Value Until They Are Certified According to Section 65b of the Indian Evidence Act: Punjab & Haryana High...

Brief facts of the case Paramjit Kaur, the proprietor of Brioshine Pharma, a licensed chemist, booked two consignments. The first consignment, on 10.06.2020 and the,...

Delhi High Court Seeks Response From Centre, RBI in PIL to Regulate Online Lending Platforms

A notice had been issued by the Delhi HC in a PIL that sought regulation of online lending platforms (Dharanidhar Karimojji vs UOI). Brief Facts: The...