J&K High Court: Life and Liberty of the Interfaith Couple Should Be Protected

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

On 13th August 2020, Hon’ble  Justice Rajesh Bindal heard the case of Shelli Sehria and another vs Union Territory of J&K and others, via video-conferencing. The Court gave directions to protect the life and liberty of the interfaith couple.

Facts of the case

The petitioners solemnized their marriage against the wishes of their family members. It is an inter-religious marriage. The execution of the marriage agreement took place on 06-06-2020. Their marriage was solemnized on 11-07-2020 for which a certificate was issued. Thereafter, the wife (petitioner) went to her residence to inform her family about the same. Her family members tortured her and fixed marriage with someone else. On 07-08-2020, she left her home to live with her husband. 

They filed a Writ Petition on 10-08-2020 that sought protection for their life and liberty. On 11-08-2020, the matter was listed in the Court. The counsel for petitioners submitted that they were unable to come to his office to appear in Court. This was because the family members of the wife are threatening their life and liberty. On 08-08-2020, the respondents registered an FIR against the husband (petitioner) under Section 366 of IPC. Subsequently, he was arrested. The Court granted them interim protection in order to appear for the hearing at the counsel’s office. The case was directed to be adjourned on 13-08-2020.

Arguments of the petitioners

The wife said that she married her husband against the wishes of her family members, but with her own will. She had informed her family members about her proposed marriage to which they disagreed. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the wife is a 21-year-old who solemnized the marriage with her husband without any pressure. Moreover, she was not kidnapped by anyone as she left her home on her own will. Thus, it cannot be a case of abduction. Protection of their life and liberty is sought.

Court’s Observation and Order

The marriage is an inter-religious one attracts threat to the life and liberty of the petitioners which should be protected. In case the husband is in custody, the wife might face difficulty due to her family members. Therefore, the Court directs that the husband is released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of ₹25,000. 

The petitioners would like to stay in the village of Mangu Chak. The village falls under the jurisdiction of Satwari Police Station. The Police of the said Police Station is directed to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners. The statement of the wife shall be recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C before the Magistrate concerned, for the purpose of investigation in the aforesaid FIR. The Court disposed of the Writ Petition.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -