Jammu and Kashmir High Court Dismiss LPA Filed by a Contractor Seeking to Quash the New E-NIT

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

On 27th July 2020, Justices Ali Mohammad Magrey and Vinod Chatterji Koul heard the case of Pawan Kumar vs J & K Tourism Development Corporation Limited and others, via video-conferencing. The Court dismissed the present Letters Patents Appeal (LPA).

Facts of the Case

The appellant is a class A contractor who responded to the Tender Notice issued through E- NIT No. 14 (e-Notice Inviting Tender). The notice was about item No. 1 for renovation and up-gradation of existing infrastructure at Chichi Mata Ji Samba. The value of the tender was Rs 60.15 lakhs. The appellant emerged as the lowest tenderer offering a bid of Rs. 42,10,500.

The respondents cancelled the process initiated according to the said E- NIT. They communicated the same to the appellant on 29.05.2020. The communication stated that the work could not be finalized. Thus, the higher authority cancelled it as per the terms and condition No. 4 of B-NIT. The respondents issued a fresh E-NIT after cancelling the previous one.

The appellant petitioned before the Writ Court for questioning the cancellation of the tender process. He also sought for quashing the fresh E-NIT. The Writ Court dismissed the petition. The aggrieved appellant filed LPA seeking reversal of Writ Court’s judgment.

Arguments of the parties

The learned counsel for the appellant stated that the respondents did not give reasons for cancellation. Hence, it has to be quashed. The issuance of fresh E-NIT aimed at depriving the appellant of executing the work as there was biasness. Thus, the Court should quash the E-NIT. Further, the impugned order of the Writ Court is not reasonable. Thus, it deserves to be set aside.

The learned counsel for the respondents argued that the respondents cancelled the tender process according to condition No. 4 of the E-NIT. Thus, the same is valid.

Court’s Analysis

Court said that condition No. 4 is unambiguous. It stated that the bids for the work will remain valid for a period of 90 days from the date of opening of bids. 

It was further said that the applicant failed to approach the respondents for completing formalities within 90 days. Thus, the respondents had the authority to cancel the process under condition No. 4 of E-NIT. An inquiry about the tender process reveals that it reached its conclusion. Further, the allotment for the same is kept on hold because of the pendency of the present LPA.

Court’s Decision

The Court said that there is no legal infirmity attached to the impugned order of the Writ Court. The Writ Court has deliberated upon and dealt with all the aspects effectively. 

Thus, the Court declined any interference with the Writ.

Court’s Order 

The Court said that the new E-NIT is processed and evaluated. It is not feasible to intervene with it and imperil the public interest. In view of the same, the Court dismissed the present Letters Patent Appeal. Therefore, the Court upheld the impugned order of the Writ Court.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -