Chhattisgarh High Court Directs State to conduct Intensive Search Operations to locate the person who returned from Tablighi Jamaat

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

Chhattisgarh High Court issued an order asking the State Government to take on the “intensive search operation” to identify the people who have returned from Tablighi jamaat meeting in Delhi’s Nizamuddin. While giving the opportunity to be heard to the number of petitions relating to the various issues related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the court noted that a total of 159 Tablighi Jamaat members had returned to the Chhattisgarh.

Out of 159 returnees, 52 persons had not been identified. The High Court while further adding on to the point of intensive search operation said that there is a need to identify the unidentified Jamaat’s as they may be a potential carrier of the COVID-19 infections. Moreover, out of 107 identified members, the report of 87 had been received.

The High Court Bench of two judges i.e. Justice Prashant Mishra and Justice Goutam Bhaduri while addressing his concern to the said matter, ordered the State Government to initiate immediate action to intensive search operation to locate the remaining 52 unidentified people who have attended the gathering and immediately obtain reports of these 23 persons whose samples have been taken but the reports are awaited.

Issue Raised

The court asked the Advocate General to file status reports for each of the following issues raised during the hearing which is related to the pandemic and they are as follows:

  • Measures were taken for welfare, particularly supply of food even for the person who does not hold ration cards.
  • Issues arising out of Government’s decision to allow such MNREGA works which do not necessitate the congregation of individuals at one place.
  • Police atrocities during maintenance of law and order amid the lock-down.
  • Release of children and women lodged in jails.

Besides these issues, Shri Prateek Sharma, the advocate for the intervenors, filed an intervention application in the Original Suo motto Writ petition agitating the issue concerning the opening of the liquor shops.

Also, it noted that the state government of Chhattisgarh was planning to take a decision on matter depending upon the decision of whether to continue the lockdown or not.

Court’s Order

After examining the submission in all the Writ Petitions, the Chhattisgarh High Court allowed two-week time to the learned advocate General Shri Satish Chandra Verma to file the status Reports on the issue raised in each petition.

As far as the issue concerning the opening of the liquor shops, the matter was heard on 13th April, 2020.

Further adding the points in the order, High Court said, they are particularly concerned about the non-testing of several persons who have returned to the states of Chhattisgarh after attending the meeting in Delhi’s Nizamuddin Markaz.

He stated the report for the same shall be submitted on the next hearing i.e. 13th April, 2020.

Except from the issues concerning the opening of liquor shops and testing of persons, all other issues shall be taken up after two weeks i.e. on 27th April, 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -