High Court of Jammu And Kashmir Rejects Letters Patent Appeal Challenging the Order on Acquisition Proceedings

Must Read

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

Follow us

The Division Bench of Hon’ble Mr Justice Dhiraj Singh and Hon’ble Mrs Justice Sindhu Sharma heard the case of Manzoor Ahmad Bhat & Ors. vs Union Territory of J&K and Ors., via video-conferencing on 26th June 2020. The Court upheld the Writ Court’s order and dismissed the appeal.

Facts of the Case

The appellants challenged the process of acquisition of All India Medical Institute, Awantipora. They alleged that the acquisition initiated by the respondents was illegal. On 16.10.2018, the Writ Court had issued an order that stayed the acquisition proceedings.  The Writ Court modified the said interim order and issued a new order on 30.12.2019. It removed the stay on the acquisition.  The appellants here filed a Letters Patent Appeal against the order of the Writ Court dated 30.12.2019.

Contention of the Appellants

The learned counsel argued that the Writ Court passed judgment without hearing them. On 30.12.2019, the Bench collapsed due to non- availability of the Hon’ble Judge due to some circumstances. The Judicial Registrar on the same day notified that the said Bench would not take up the cases.

The appellants, thus, believed that the Court adjourned the cases. Hence, they were not present when the Coordinate Bench took up the case. The respondents made a request upon which the Coordinate Bench took up the case on the same day. The order passed by the Coordinate the bench is in violation of Order 39 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Contention of the Respondents

The Respondents argued that before the filing of the writ petition, the entire process of acquisition completed. Thus, the Court cannot interfere in the acquisition matter which attained finality.  The outcome of the writ petition would remain unchanged, despite the fact that the appellants were not present.

Court’s Observations

On 30.12.2019, the Judicial Registrar issued a notice. The notice informed the appellants that the Coordinate bench could take the case. Thus, the appellants knew about the same.  The appellants had enough notice of the hearing. Thus, there was enough compliance with the requirements of Order 39 Rule 4 CPC in the present case. On 30.12.2019, the Writ Court modified its order dated 16.10.2018.  The Court annulled the previous order. Besides, the Medical Education Department had also taken over possession. Thus, there was enough justification for the Writ Court to alter the order.

Court’s Decision

The above discussion of this Court proves that the appeal had no merit. Hence, this Court dismissed the Letters Patent Appeal.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Plea Seeking Dream 11 to Be Declared as Betting Platform Dismissed by Rajasthan High Court

Rajasthan HC dismissed a plea that alleged Dream 11 to be a betting platform, on the assertion that the game depends on skill &...

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -