Gujarat High Court to Hear Plea Seeking Monetary Compensation for COVID-19 Patients

Must Read

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years...

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA)....

Follow us

The petitioner, Advocate Neel Lakhani, has filed a PIL seeking compensation for people suffered due to COVID-19. The plea highlights the grants received by the government and assistance provided through the same. It does not include any compensation for directly affected people. Hence, the petitioner has approached the Court under Article 226 of the Constitution.

Brief Facts of the Case 

On 25.01.2020, the Union Government had issued guidelines to take appropriate measures for preventing COVID-19. The government reported the first case in February 2019. Further, it issued notice to draw money from the State Disaster Response Fund for temporary relief of the victims. However, it did not mention anything concerned with the National Disaster Response Fund.

In March 2020, the WHO, Union Government and Gujarat Government declared COVID-19 as ‘pandemic’. Meanwhile, the Union Government approached the WHO and World Bank for urgent financial assistance of at least $1 billion. It received the required assistance on 14.04.2020.

Till date, a million people have contracted the disease and thousands have died in the country. However, the government did not announce any compensation for directly affected people. Hence, the petitioner has filed the PIL seeking appropriate directions from the Court.

Contents of the Petition

The petitioner has stated statutory provisions to support his claims.

Violation of Statutory Provisions

To begin with, he has cited provisions of the Disaster Management Act, 2005. According to Section 11, it is mandatory for the government to draw a national plan to prevent as well as mitigate the disaster. As per Section 12(iii) and (iv), every affected person must receive compensation. However, neither does a plan exists nor did the government award any compensation.

The government has received donations via the ‘PM CARES’ and ‘CM CARES’ Fund. It also received funds from WHO, World Bank and USAID. The International Monetary Fund has provided India with a special drawing right of $13 billion. The government cannot divert the amount from such funds for any other purpose. Hence, as trustees of the funds, it must utilize the amount for maximum welfare and relief of the affected people.

Implementation Challenges

Further, the petitioner submits that the relief packages must not be equated with the mandatory scheme under the Disaster Management Act.

The plea also assesses the implementation of various packages. It is time-consuming and discriminatory to some extent. There has been a limited understanding among people with no clarity of processing the claims. A large amount of vulnerable and poor communities is left out of the rehabilitation process.

Violation of the Fundamental Rights

The petitioner has also contended Article 21 of the Constitution. As the issue pertains to the fundamental right, there must be a time-bound direction. Inter alia, the victims must have non-discriminatory access to effective remedies and justice. This must include restitution, compensation, rehabilitation, psychological care, etc.

Contravention of Tortious Provisions

The petitioner has touched upon the provisions of tortious liabilities. The disaster amounts to indirect negligence by the state authorities. Hence, it must be vicariously liable to pay compensation to all the victims. Moreover, the ‘doctrine of parents patriae’ refers to the obligation of the state to protect the rights and privileges of its citizens.

The Preamble also enshrines the concept of a ‘welfare state’. The fundamental right to life shall be violated if a citizen dies as a result of any unnatural death. The state must concede to its responsibilities and liabilities.

Prayer for Relief

The petitioner has made prayer on the basis of facts and observations. His foremost plea is to take suo moto cognizance of the sufferings of directly affected people.

The petitioner has requested a writ to direct the government to formulate a scheme for proper utilization of the funds. The government must create a separate fund to compensate citizens affected directly. Such a fund must be subjected to separate audit on a periodical basis to prevent misuse.

The Court may appoint ombudsmen for the supervision of various scheme and packages. The ombudsmen may submit a regular report to the High Court.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

Bombay High Court Pursues Case Alleging Media Trial, Says NBSA Guidelines Must Be Toothed by Centre

Amid the pleas alleging media trials, the Division Bench had been hearing submissions of the News Broadcasters’ Authority (NBA). It prayed that severe restrictions...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -