Gujarat High Court: Legal Awareness Required to Prevent Minor Boys From the Label of ‘Offender’, Especially Under POCSO

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

The Gujarat High Court has shed light on the crimes committed by minor boys under the POCSO Act, 2012. The Court expressed concern for highlighting the need for legal awareness. This is in the context of preventing serious crimes by a minor against another.

Brief Facts and Procedural History

A minor girl had eloped with a minor boy in January 2020. The petitioner registered the First Information Report at Kheralu Camp Police Station, Vadnagar. The FIR asserted the abduction of a minor girl by the boy. Hence, it attracts the provisions of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.

The petitioner, a father of the minor girl, filed a habeas corpus petition at Gujarat HC. On 04.03.2020, the Court handed over the investigation to the Deputy Superintendent of Police. Subsequently, the Court directed the executive to produce the minor girl for initiating proceedings. Consequently, the officials publicized the non-availability of the corpus. However, the investigation team traced the corpus to the relatives of the boy. Yet, the minor offender is still absconding. Furthermore, the Court presented the corpus before the Court on 29.06.2020.

Court’s Observation

The corpus stated that the parents of the girl tried to engage her elsewhere. This is supposedly done to prevent her willful matrimony. The minor girl has neither completed her high school nor is keen to pursue studies. Moreover, the minor girl has shown her disinclination to join her parents. Although there is no relevance to the minor’s will, she cannot be forced against her will. The Court, as a result, directed her 8-week stay at Women Protection Home, Patan.

The Court made an observation for the punitive element in the present matter. It opined that though he is a minor, he chose to take away the minor corpus. This has knitted him in the net of law, particularly the POCSO Act. The main goal of the Act is to protect and prevent serious offenses against the girl child. The offenders under the said Act are subjected to rigorous punishment. The Court observed an increasing number of young boys contributing to the list of offenders. Further, the Court observed that this aspect is present in numerous contemporary petitions of habeas corpus. 

The Court asserted- “We also notice that young boys who themselves are not major, without realizing the consequences of their actions, or actuated by the frenzy of youth, with a careless approach towards stringent laws label themselves as offenders in the matters of POCSO, and face serious consequences of rigorous punishment prescribed under the law.”

Therefore, the right understanding must be provided in the form of legal awareness. This may prevent crimes committed by children due to their lack of inferring laws.

Court’s Order

Justice Sonia Gokani and Justice N. Anjaria have pronounced the order. They shall take up the matter on 25.08.2020.

The Court has ordered physical, mental, and emotional care for the girl child. The Superintendent has to ensure her safety at the Women Protection Home. The superintendent has to also ensure proper counseling sessions for the girls. Moreover, the Superintendent is ordered to collaborate with the Anti Human Trafficking cell and the District Legal Services Authority. The alliance shall take up the task of creating awareness amongst the youngsters.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -