Gujarat High Court Expresses Strong Views on the Religious Appeasement Policy of State Government

Must Read

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Follow us

The Gujarat High Court has pointed out the fallacy in State Government’s approach towards religious sentiments. It asserted that the choice of public health is mandatory over religion. The state must be cautious while considering requests and must not indulge in appeasing religious heads.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The annual Lord Jagannath Rath Yatra has been in contentions amid the lockdown. Lakhs of devotees attend the event over a walk of 16- 18 kilometres. In the month of June, the Court passed an interim order cancelling the procession in all parts of Gujarat. Further, the Court directed the State Authorities to file an affidavit for the same.

Meanwhile, the Court had to address two petitions seeking restrictions on the procession. Hence, the Court disposed of the petitions while expressing disappointment over the State Government’s affidavit.

Court’s Observations

The Court noted the passive and yielding approach of the State Government. The secular state must ensure good health even if it hurts the religious expressions. If it gives up on popular sentiment, it will lose the fight against COVID- 19. It would be devasting to conduct a major public gathering after the existing loss of lives in the state.

Moreover, the siding of government may prove fatal, as an incorrect notion runs in the minds of the public. It must realize that in the absence of an effective vaccine, social distancing is the only solution. Hence, it is paramount to list priorities for effective decision making. Gujarat is a land of festivals and it is sad to see it not being celebrated. However, it must prioritize the safety and health of the people.

The Court also remarked that it is not the time for negotiation and persuasion. The government should not follow a policy of appeasement. It asserted:

 “If the government remains nonchalant on the issue of religious gatherings, it will have a serious impact on how masses take the pandemic. They too may become relax and easy-going, while indulging in gatherings and flouting the social distancing norms.”

Court’s Judgment

Chief Justice Vikram Nath and Justice J. B. Pardiwala pronounced the oral judgement. They decided on the petitions seeking restrictions on proposed Jagannath Rath Yatra. They remarked that permitting religious processions is under the domain of the State Authorities. The State must consider prevailing situations and not religious sentiments during the assessment.

They also quoted the lines of Former Chief Justice of the State of California, U.S.A.- The judiciary must not take on the colouration of whatever may be popular at the moment. We are the guardian of rights and we have to tell people things they often do not like to hear.”


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Asks State To File Reply To Examine Whether Privacy Rights of an Individual Can Be Violated by Issuing an Executive...

A Writ Petition was instituted by an individual for violation of his fundamental rights by the State before the Madhya Pradesh High Court. The...

Bombay High Court Allows Export of Pending Consignment of Onions in Respect of Which Shipping Bills Have Been Generated Before Notification of the Ban

A writ petition challenging the notification dated 14th September 2020 to ban the export of onions was filed by the Exporters Association before the...

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -