Gujarat High Court: Can Permission be Granted for an Unregistered Members of an Association in taking out a Procession?

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

The Petitioner, the chairman of the Eide Milad Committee, an unregistered association filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 14, 19, 28 and 226 of the Constitution of India, regarding permission for taking out a Religious Procession of Eide Milad.

Facts

The Petitioner had filed an application dated 12/10/2019 before the authorities (the respondent) for permission about the religious procession of Eide Milad and the respondents did not take any steps which are violative of Article 14, 19 and 28 of the Constitution and thus the Petitioner seeks Writ of Mandamus or any other order/direct to direct the respondents authorities for granting the permission for the same during pendency and till final disposal of the petition,

After notice being issued by the court, the respondents rejected the application on the grounds of negative opinions being given by Traffic Branch of the Police Station

That there are two committees functioning with the similar name being Eid ­Milad unnabi (Central) Committee. Whereas the petitioner Committee is not registered and Committee chaired by one Shri Rafiq is a registered trust and therefore, the permission to carry out procession is given to the registered trust. Apprehension was also canvassed that it appears that there is a dispute between both these committees

Arguments

Learned Advocate Mr. K R Koshti for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is taking out the procession on the occasion of Eid­e­Milad since last 40 years and since last year application of the petitioner is not granted by the respondent authority for taking out the procession. He further submitted that though the petitioner is an unregistered association of the community as it is taking out a procession on the occasion of Eid­e­Milad for last 40 years petitioner should be permitted to participate in the Eid­e­Milad procession by the respondent.

It was further submitted that the respondent has rejected the permission to the petitioner without any authority and petitioner should be permitted to take out a procession as the petitioner was carrying out procession since last many years. It was therefore submitted that petitioner should be allowed to participate in the procession on the occasion of Eid­e­Milad.

The decision of the Court

It is further submitted that if the members of the petitioner unregistered association wish to take part in procession, they may take part without creating any problem of law and order., The Counsel for Respondent, Mr. P.S. Champaneri, further made it clear that if the members of the petitioner unregistered association wish to  take part in the procession, respondent cannot and will not prevent any person to take part in the Eid­e­ Milad procession.

In view of the fact that permission to take out Eid­e ­Milad procession is granted, the main grievance raised in the petition is redressed. However, it is made clear that such procession will be taken out keeping harmony amongst the members of all associations whether it is registered or unregistered and such procession shall be strictly carried out in accordance with terms and conditions of the permission granted by the respondent.

 

Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -