Gujarat HC Provides Suggestions in the Amendment Act of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act

Must Read

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India &...

Follow us

The Gujarat High Court has welcomed the step of the State Government to widen the scope of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985. However, misuse of the provisions at the stage of execution was also taken into consideration. Therefore, the Court has reiterated the observations made in a past case to ensure more considerable public interest.

Brief Facts

The Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 provides for preventive detention of bootleggers, dangerous persons, drug offenders and immoral traffic offenders to prevent the anti-social and dangerous activities prejudicial to the maintenance of public order. Such persons can be detained on the satisfaction of the officials. Further, the State Government has decided to extend the provisions to cybercriminals, loan sharks and sexual offenders.

While deciding the present case under application of the said Act, the Court has commented on the State Government’s decision to extend the scope.

The suggestions were made by the Coram comprising Chief Justice Vikram Nath and Justice J. B. Pardiwala.

Court’s Observations

The Court has observed the shortcomings of the Act and suggested solutions to rectify the same. It was noted that ample of detentions under the said Act was challenged in the Court. However, the State was unable to defend, as most of them were issued casually. While exerting the powers of preventive detention, the State must be mindful of the terms ‘law and order’, ‘public order’ and ‘security of the State’. An act may affect law and order but not public order, just as an act may affect public order but not the security of the State. Therefore, the legislation must be careful in using these expressions.

Moreover, according to Section 3(2) of the said Act, the State Government may confer the power to the District Magistrate or a Commissioner of Police in whose jurisdiction anti-social activities prevail ‘or’ may prevail in future. Here, the Court has observed that the use of disjunctive ‘or’ without any specific period provides for a blanket delegation of powers. There has been no review of the delegation of power as the subordinates continue to issue orders for preventive detention according to the 1985 notification.

Further, the Court remarked that the State Government owes a duty to apply its mind while exerting powers under Section 3(3) of the said Act. The section provides for the power of confirmation or approval of the order of detention. It asserted- “The stage of approval should not be treated as an empty formality. The Government owes a duty to see whether the order of detention passed by the Detaining Authority is in accordance with the law, more particularly in conformity with the judicial pronouncements of the Supreme Court and the High Court of Gujarat.”

Therefore, the power of grant of approval cannot be exerted mechanically as it is an additional safeguard introduced by the statute. In view of the aforesaid circumstances, the legislature must ensure implementation of the same.

Relevance

Owing to the unprecedented situation, the Central and State Government has issued guidelines throughout the lockdown period. The executive has invoked provisions of several legislations to enforce the norms. It includes Section 144 of CrPC, the Epidemic Diseases Act, sections of the Indian Penal Code, etc. One of the widely invoked preventive measures has been the Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act. The Act permits preventive detention of a dangerous person on the subjective satisfaction of the police officials. Therefore, it becomes imperative to monitor and control any misuse of such provisions to ensure the principles of democracy.    


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

Delhi High Court Directs Delhi Jal Board To Make Supply of Potable Drinking Water

The High Court of Delhi in the matter of Delhi Sainik Cooperation Housing Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors held that right to...

Punjab & Haryana High Court Orders Security To BJP Leader Alleged for Not Supporting Farmers Protest

The Order had come in the form of a Writ Petition filed by Tikshan Sood under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petition before...

Lahore High Court Outlaws Two-Finger Virginity Test

The Lahore High Court in Pakistan has outlawed the use and conduct of virginity tests, namely, the use of the “two-finger” virginity test and...

London Court Rejects Assange’s Extradition – What Happens Now? 

Earlier last week, District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, sitting in the Westminster Magistrates’ Court denied the Government of the U.S.A.'s request to the U.K. to...

Calcutta High Court Decides in Favor of Contractor as He Accidentally Pays an Excessively High Amount

Introduction The present writ petition has been filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondents to revoke the Petitioner’s offer as...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -