Gujarat HC: Petition filed for adopting an abandoned girl child found near Deesa Railway Station

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

A petition was filed under Article 226 of the constitution to grant Permission for adopting an abandoned girl child in the interest of justice.

Facts of the Case

The petitioner, aged about 32 years, house­wife, residing with her husband viz. Timir Sheth married for the last 14 years. Out of the wedlock, the petitioner has no child of her own. It is further stated by the petitioner that the husband of the petitioner is carrying out Diamond Business at Surat. They are financially and monetarily sound as well as having a good reputation and dignity in society.

On 08.10.2019, one abandoned girl child came to be found from area of Deesa Railway Station at around 4.30 p.m. by local residents and media person; were concerned police, 108 and uncle of the petitioner reached the spot. The child was given first aid and through private vehicle by she was taken to Hospital, Deesa since her condition was critical.

After hospitalizing the child in the evening, concerned Doctor suggested lodging complaint. Therefore, FIR was lodged dated with Deesa Police Station, Dist: Banaskantha for the offence punishable under Section 317 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown lady for dumping girl child of 15­20 days.

On 09.10.2019, the petitioner acknowledged about the said child and immediately reached Deesa from Surat to take care of her and since then, the child is under care of the petitioner thereafter, the petitioner  was also permitted to have the interim custody of child as per order dated 30.10.2019, passed by the Child Welfare Committee, Banaskantha.

The petitioner is taking care of girl child since 09.10.2019 and she has been nurturing her with motherly love and affection and taking utmost care of the child which is stated on oath by the petitioner no.1.Thereafter, the petitioner no.1 made an application before the Child Welfare Committee, Banaskantha on 19.11.2019 with a request to consider her application for adopting an abandoned girl as a special circumstance.

That one FIR is lodged against the petitioner No.2 for illegally having the custody of child contrary to provisions of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”).

The petitioner, therefore, filed this petition for appropriate relief(s), as mentioned hereinabove.

Arguments for adopting an abandoned girl

Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner does not claim in any manner the permanent custody of girl child at present. By taking into consideration the facts of present case, he further submitted that if the custody of child is given to petitioner the petitioner shall take utmost care of child till the application for adoption is decided by and shall abide by any condition which may be imposed by the respondent no.2­ Child Welfare Committee, Banaskantha, permitting to retain custody of child till her application is decided.

On other hands, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent’s State submitted that as per provision of  Section 31 of the Act, a child in need of care and protection may be produced before an individual member for being placed in safe custody or otherwise when the Committee is not in session. As per Section 38 of the Act, there is a procedure of declaring the child legally free for adoption. She also referred to the provisions of Section 33 with regard to inquiry contemplated on the production of child or receipt of the report under Section 32. It was, therefore, submitted that as per the provisions of the Act, the petitioner cannot retain the custody of the child, nor the committee can hand over the custody of the child to the petitioner. She further submitted that by order dated 30.10.2019, the custody of the child was handed over to the petitioner on various terms and conditions stipulated therein only for a limited – temporary period of 10 days. It is also stipulated in the said order that on completion of 10 days, the custody of the girl child to be handed over to the respondent no.2. However, the petitioner did not obey the order, and therefore, the criminal case is filed by the respondent no.2 against the petitioner

Decision of the Court

It is not in dispute that the girl child is in custody of the petitioner since 09.10.2019 i.e. after a day on which the girl child was found near the Deesa Railway Station in the order abandoned condition and the Petitioner no.1 taking her care for last one and half months. It is also not in dispute that the Respondent no.2 has passed order dated 30.10.2019 to hand over custody of girl child to the petitioner to take care for a temporary period of 10 days with a view to providing medical treatment to the child. Taking into consideration the provisions of the Act which is benevolent in nature to provide welfare and to take care of abandoned child, it will be in the interest of welfare of child to continue the custody of the girl child with petitioner as the Respondent no. 2 has already passed the order to give temporary custody of child to the petitioner for a period of 10 days. If the said order is continued till the application of the petitioner is decided by the Respondent no.2 as to whether such child can be given in adoption to the petitioner, it will be for the welfare of the child to continue her custody under the care of the petitioner.

[googlepdf url=”http://libertatem.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/SCA200572019_GJHC240722732019_2_22112019.pdf” download=”Download Judgement PDF” width=”100%” height=”900″]


Contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now. You can also join our Team of Courtroom and regularly contribute cases like the above one.

For more Courtroom Updates, check out our Courtroom Page

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -