Gauhati High Court: Accused Sentenced with Rigorous Imprisonment For Murder

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

Tapan Ghosh and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/- along with default clause. The prosecution case, in a nutshell, is that on 04.09.2012, at about 10:30 p.m., when the deceased was coming home after closing his shop, the appellant, armed with a sharp weapon (dao and dagger), had chased the deceased person into the house of Trilochan Singh and hacked him to death.

The Officer-in-Charge of the Lanka Police Station had made G.D. Entry No 94 on 04.09.2012 on the basis of information received from one Bappi Ghosh regarding the murder of Tapan Ghosh. Sub-Inspector (SI) of Police Sri Tankeswar Das, who was the Investigating Officer in this case, had conducted inquest on the dead body and prepared Inquest Report dated 05.09.2012. Upon completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer had submitted charge sheet against all the five accused persons for committing the murder of the deceased Tapan Ghosh acting in furtherance of their common intention. The accused persons had pleaded not guilty. Hence, the matter was sent up for trial.

Arguments before the Court

Mr. B. Prasad, learned Amicus Curiae, appeared for the appellant wherein Mr. R. Baruah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam, appeared for Respondent No. 1. No one appeared for Respondent No.2 despite service of notice. By the impugned judgement and order dated 21.10.2017 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Hojai, Sankardev Nagar, in connection with Sessions case No. 80(N) /2014, the sole appellant Amit Ghosh has been convicted under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for committing the murder.

Issues before the High Court

The learned trial court has convicted the appellant for committing an offence punishable under section 302 of the IPC while acquitting the remaining accused persons for want of evidence to show their involvement in commissioning the crime.  The defense side did not adduce any evidence but the accused has denied his involvement in the incident.

Judgment

The bulk of evidence brought on record by the prosecution side clearly goes to show that the appellant Amit Ghosh had chased the victim Tapan Ghosh to the house of Trilochan and hacked him to death with a “dao” by inflicting multiple cut injuries. By relying upon the evidence adduced by the prosecution side, the learned Trial Court has held that the charge of murder brought against the appellant Amit Ghosh was established beyond reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the learned Trial Court had convicted the appellant for committing the offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default, rigorous imprisonment for another six months. However, the other accused persons were acquitted on the ground of want of evidence against them.

As noticed above, there is overwhelming evidence including the testimony of two independent eye-witnesses, available on record so as to establish the charge against the appellant and therefore motive for the crime, in our view, would not have any material bearing in this case. Having regard to the bulk of evidence brought on record more particularly, the testimony of the two eyewitnesses PWs 9 and 10, we are of the view that the learned Trial Court has rightly convicted the appellant for committing an offence under Section 302 of the IPC and sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life besides imposing fine of Rs 10,000/-. We are, therefore, of the view that no interference is called for with the impugned judgement and order dated 21.10.17. As such, the conviction of the appellant and the sentences imposed upon him by the learned Trial Court stands affirmed.

This appeal is found to be devoid of any merit and is, accordingly, dismissed.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -