Father Granted Anticipatory Bail For Sexually Assaulting His Six-Year-Old Son By Kerala High Court

Must Read

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work,...

Follow us

The petitioner was residing with his son in a room in Calicut Tower Hotel, Khozikode in the month of November in 2015. During their stay in the hotel, one day petitioner touched and held his son’s manhood in his hands with sexual intent. Mother of the victim asserted that Petitioner had done the same act on a few earlier occasions as well. Petitioner was working abroad earlier but currently, he is residing permanently in Kerala. Mother of the victim is a school teacher, On 17th November 2017, she lodged a complaint with Co-ordinator of the Childline Authority in which she narrated the acts of sexual assault committed by petitioner. Childline Authorities alerted the police. Police responded quickly and recorded the statement of the victim boy immediately and thereafter, a case was registered against the petitioner. Petitioner was charged under section 7 read with 8,9(l), 9(m), 9(n) and 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. Statement of the mother of the victim reveals that she was aware of the acts of sexual assault committed by the petitioner on her son since 2015 but she did not complain to anyone before 19th November 2017. Her relationship with her husband and in-laws had been strained by then and she also filed a case of cruelty under section 498A of Indian Penal Code against her husband and his relatives. Petitioner approached the High Court of Kerala seeking anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Cr.P.C in case he is arrested.

The Decision of the Case

Learned Single Judge Justice R. Narayana Pisharadi after examining the evidence and listening to both the sides granted the anticipatory bail to the petitioner provided he executes a bond for Fifty thousand rupees with two sureties. Court further imposed few other conditions such as:

  1. The investigating officer may interrogate the petitioner before releasing him on the bail and petitioner has to co-operate with him.
  2. Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 9 a.m and 11 a.m on all Saturdays for a period of three months from the date of release on bail.
  3. Petitioner shall not influence or intimate the prosecution witnesses in any manner and not tamper with evidence.
  4. Petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him to disclose such facts to the court.
  5. Petitioner shall not leave the state of Kerala without prior permission of the jurisdictional court and surrender his passport to the same within three days of his release on bail. If he does not possess any passport, he shall file an affidavit to that effect in that court within that period.
  6. Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer as and when directed in writing to do so.
  7. If the petitioner violates any of the conditions of bail, the Court having jurisdiction over the case is at liberty to cancel his bail without any further orders of this court but in accordance with law.

Learnings of the Case

From this case, we learn that anticipatory bail can be granted in cases falling under Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 by the court after imposing certain conditions on the person seeking bail.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Delhi HC: Mens Rea Essential Before Passing an Order U/S 14b of EPF Act

  In the matter of M/s Durable Doors and Windows v APFC, Gurugram, the bench allowed the Petitioner's appeal holding that mens rea is an...

Delhi HC: Language of Statement and Testimony of Complainant Need Not Be Identical

A single-judge bench of J. Vibhu Bakhru of the Delhi High Court upheld the accused's conviction in Kailash @ Balli v State. The bench...

COVID Results Shall Be Conveyed To the Person Within 24 Hours: Delhi High Court

The order has come in a writ petition moved by Rakesh Malhotra. The Petitioner herein seeks to ramp up testing facilities in Delhi.   Facts of...

Delhi High Court Sets Aside the Order of the Trial Court in the Chief Secretary Assault Case

In the case of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal & Anr. V. State NCT of Delhi, Mr.Justice Suresh Kumar Kait has set aside the 24.07.2019 Order...

Delhi High Court Temporarily Restrains Vintage Moments’ Alcohol Sale in Case of Trademark Infringement

The manufacturers of the Alcohol Brand Magic Moments had filed a suit. The Delhi High Court has passed an order restraining the manufacturing, marketing,...

NGT Red-Flags Kaleshwaram Project: Green Clearance Violated the Law, Halt Work

Excerpt The National Green Tribunal (NGT), Principal Bench, dated 20th October 2020, directed the Telangana government to stop all work, except the drinking water component...

There Can Be No Leniency Shown To Appellant Who Pleaded To Reduce Sentence: Delhi High Court

Facts On 25.2.2016 the victim’s sister who was 13 years old was present with her sister who was 2 years old (victim) at their home....

Violation of Executive Instructions Cannot Be Sole Ground to Invalidate Transfer Orders: Tripura High Court

In Dr Bithika Choudhury vs the State of Tripura & Ors., a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S.G. Chattopadhyay...

Case Regarding Anticipatory Bail, Applicant May Be Released Imposing Suitable Conditions: Gujarat High Court

A Single-Judge Bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Dr Justice A.P. Thakur had been hearing submissions of the Applicant to release him...

Proof of Infliction of Fatal Injury Not Mandatory for Conviction Under Section 307, IPC: Tripura High Court

In the case of Mamin Miah vs the State of Tripura, a Division Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice S. Talapatra and Hon’ble Justice S....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -