DU Exams: Delhi High Court Issues Notice to Common Service Centres to Fix their Plans for Conducting Online Exams

Must Read

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

Follow us

The Delhi High Court issued a notice to Common Service Academy which got directions from the Delhi University to enable the outstation of final year students for the online, open-book examination.

Brief Facts of the Case 

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic had been aggravating over the past few days. Amid this mayhem, many Colleges had decided to conduct examinations to maintain the academic progress of students and to ensure the prime quality of education despite the current situation. They had also decided to prevent any drawback for the students in the future. For this, the Delhi University had decided to conduct examinations. It had conducted online mock exams so that the students could be aware of the online examination platform. During this, several of them had faced technical glitches and were thus worried about the exams.

For further simplification, the authority permitted Open Book Examinations. A petition got filed concerning the above issues. The DU had scheduled to hold final year undergraduate online OBE from August 10th to 31st. The students who are excluded from online exams had the opportunity to appear for physical examinations. This would happen sometime in September. It had also decided that the first phase of mock tests would begin from July 27th and the second phase would begin from August 1st.

Petitioner’s Contentions

The Petitioner stated that the students should get at least 24 hours to submit their answer sheets due to technical glitches. The Counsel intervenor for the students pointed out that the University was not complying with the earlier orders. This was on sending the question paper by email, stopping the clock for 30 mins in case of a technical glitch, etc.

Respondent’s Contentions

Senior Advocate Sachin Dutta had represented the Delhi University. He stated that the CSCs functioned under the aegis of the Ministry of Information Technology, Government of India. Advocate M Rupal added that Delhi University had signed an MoU with the CSC Academy. This was to provide logistical assistance to it for the online examination amid COVID-19. Delhi University had contended that they were holding online exams. It was in view of the UGC guidelines, which made it mandatory to conduct final year examinations.

Senior Advocate Dutta assured the Court that all its orders would be duly complied with. He stated that the first mock was only for the limited purpose of “downloading and uploading” the question paper. He also stated these directions are must to follow during the real-time test. Apurv Kurup was the counsel for the UGC. He told the Court that 24 hours duration for submission would raise questions about the “sanctity” of the examinations.

Court’s Observation

A single-judge bench of Justice Pratibha M Singh had been set up. The hearing occurred via video conferencing. The order got passed after they received the notice of the poor condition of infrastructure at CSCs. The Court got information that the CSCs run at the village panchayat level in the form of a public cafe. Professionals did not run them as such.

The Court had directed the CEO of CSC Academy to list out all the centres which are suitable for the examination and state their preparedness. It also perused the report submitted by the UGC’s committee, headed by Professor R C Kuhad on final guidelines. On the last date of hearing, the Court had asked UGC to clarify if they are including MCQs, Assignments, presentations, etc. for final year students. The Court asked the Counsel for DU to seek instructions if any other organization was also engaged in conducting exams. Besides CSC Academy, the varsity conducts exams in-house. The Court remarked:

“Sanctity has to be balanced with the kind of facilities which are available with us.”

Solicitor General, Tushar Mehta informed the Court that challenges to the UGC guidelines on several grounds were pending before the Supreme Court. The Court opined that the cases before it and the orders of Supreme Court might include certain overlapping issues. Thus, considered it appropriate to delay the hearing. It also observed that unlike other universities across the globe, Delhi University had not been helping its students.

Court’s Decision

The Court will hear the main petition on July 30th.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgments from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

Plea Challenging the AIBE Rules Framed by BCI Filed in the Supreme Court

A Writ Petition was presently filed in the Supreme Court by a newly enrolled lawyer challenging the All India Bar Examination Rules 2010 which have been framed by the Bar Council of India which mandates that an advocate has to qualify for the All India Bar Examination (AIBE) to practice law after enrollment.

Bombay High Court: Mere Presence at the Crime Scene Not Enough for Punishment

The Bombay High Court ruled that it cannot be considered a crime if a person is merely present at the crime scene which falls under the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels and Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act 2016. It also quashed two First Information Reports (FIR) against two individuals who were arrested in a raid at a dance bar by the Santacruz Police, in 2017.

CAIT Files a Plea Against WhatsApp’s New Privacy Policy in the Supreme Court

Confederation of All India Traders (CAIT) has filed a petition against WhatsApp’s new privacy rules in the Supreme Court. The petition says that WhatsApp which is known to render public services by providing a platform to communicate has recently imposed a privacy policy that is unconstitutional, which not only goes against the fundamental rights of citizens but also jeopardizes the national security of our country.

RTI Activist Files a Plea in Bombay High Court Against Bharat Biotech’s Covaxin

On Saturday, a plea has been filed before the Bombay High Court by an activist stating that Bharat Biotech Covaxin had not been granted full approval but a restricted use in clinical trials according to the Drugs Comptroller General of India. The Company's phase 3 trials are ongoing and the DGCI has not made any data available in the public domain for peer- review by independent scientists.

WhatsApp Emails Delhi HC Judge Asking Her Not To Hear the Plea Challenging New Privacy Policy

The Delhi High Court raised strong objection to an E-mail sent by WhatsApp asking a judge not to hear the plea which challenges its new privacy policy. Justice Pratibha Singh said that the e-mail that was withdrawn later was totally unwarranted as she was anyway going to recuse from hearing the plea which was filed by Rohilla Chaitanya who contends that the new privacy policy of WhatsApp provides 360-degree access to a customer’s virtual activity and is against the fundamental right of privacy.

TRP Scam Case: Bombay HC Extends Protection To Arnab Goswami and Other Employees Till the Next Hearing

On Friday, the Bombay High court extended the protection that was given, to Republic TV’s Editor in Chief Arnab Goswami and other employees of ARG Outlier Media Private Limited till January 29th in the alleged case of Television Rating Point manipulation. A status report was submitted by the police to the division bench of Justices S.S.Shinde and Manish Pitale by the Police on the ongoing case.

Plea Seeks FIR Against Maharashtra Minister Dhananjay Munde in Bombay HC for False Info

A plea has been filed in Bombay High Court seeking an FIR against Maharashtra minister Dhananjay Munde who is undergoing times of trouble due to his extra-marital affair. Recently, an FIR had been lodged against Munde by a woman, accusing him of raping her sister. Munde clarified that he was actually in a relationship with that woman and had two children. He accused the two women of blackmailing him.

Writ Petition for Compensation Accepted by Calcutta High Court 

Introduction The Petitioner Purna Ch. Biswas filed a Writ Petition with the complaint that their claims for a higher quantum of compensation have not yet...

No Members Could Be Disqualified Without Authorisation by Political Party: Gujarat High Court

Excerpt The dispute application no.7 of 2020 filed by respondent no.2 before designated authority. Thereafter the designated authority order dated 28.10.2020 disqualified the petitioner and...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -