Plea For Grant Of Medical Term Insurance Under CM Advocates Welfare Fund Before Delhi High Court

Must Read

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus....

Follow us

The Bar Council of Delhi has filed a writ petition for mandamus through its Chairman KC Mittal. It was under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution. The petition seeks to direct the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi to grant medical and term insurance policies to the Advocates finalized by the Government of Delhi and registered under the Chief Minister’s Advocate Welfare Scheme. 

Brief Facts of the Case 

The petitioner mentioned that the Cabinet in 2019 had decided to provide benefits to the Advocates under CM Advocates Welfare Scheme. The Advocates should have registered themselves under the Bar Council of Delhi. They have their names on the voters’ list to avail benefits. The benefits included Medical insurance and Term insurance of 5 lakhs and 10 lakhs. A committee had been set up to enforce this decision. But this scheme was not implemented due to an undue delay until 2020. 

From 20th March 2020, the registrations were open up to 31st March 2020. The Prime Minister had imposed a complete lockdown due to the COVID-19 crisis. The Registrations began at the same time and the Respondent’s server had been down too. Thus, several advocates were unable to log in. On request, the duration for registration was extended up to 19th April 2020. The issues were not resolved and 1 and ½ months had elapsed, but the benefits were not granted. Thus, the petitioner filed a writ of mandamus before the HC of Delhi to seek a direction to the Delhi Government. 

Contentions before the Court 

The petitioner claimed that the government failed to provide benefits through the scheme. The respondents had failed to resolve the technical issues despite several reminders. This issue had continued to exist during the lockdown up to the extended date of 19.04.2020. The respondents did not accept the request for extension up to 30.04.2020. This was arbitrary and unreasonable, violating Article 14 of the Constitution of India.  

Respondent No. 1 had deprived the advocates entitled to the benefits and denied them opportunities. It was due to no fault of theirs, but due to the failure of Respondent No. 1. The Petitioner mentions that the legal fraternity had appreciated the budgetary allocation. The inaction and delay had caused serious prejudice. It deprived them of insurance during COVID-19. 

“That more than 1 and ½ months has elapsed, but the schemes have not been implemented so far, despite registration of various advocates, leaving aside those who could not register due to inefficiency of Respondent No. 1. It may be pertinent to point out that those insurance policies as promised are necessary to provide treatment to lawyers, particularly during Covid-19.” 

The petitioner claims to have filed this petition to safeguard the interest of the legal fraternity. The Delhi Government had assured the Bar Council of Delhi that steps were being taken by the Government about the Chief Minister’s Welfare Scheme, during the hearing of the plea.

This writ petition was in relation to an identical writ petition titled- Govind Swaroop Chaturvedi v. State of NCT of Delhi & others.

Held

A Single Judge Bench consisting of Hon’ble Justice Pratibha M. Singh had been set up. Before this petition, the HC of Delhi issued a notice to the Government. It asked to extend the last date of registration considering the lockdown. The Bench allowed the Government to place the concerned documents on record. This showed the steps taken by the Government to put in place the Chief Minister’s Advocates Welfare Scheme.  

The Bench has stated that the next hearing would be on the 18th of June 2020.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

 

Latest News

Police To Decide on the Entry of Farmers To Delhi on Republic Day Says Supreme Court

While the Supreme Court heard a plea seeking an injunction against the tractor rally that is scheduled for January 26th, it held that it is the decision of the Delhi Police officers to see whether the protesting farmers should get entry into Delhi on Republic Day.

[Sushant Singh Rajput Case]: Republic TV & Times Now Hindered Investigation Probe Says Bombay HC

In November last year, the Court had reserved its judgement on the PILs that came from 8 former police officers from Maharashtra, lawyers, activists and NGOs, seeking restraining orders against the media trial in the Sushant Singh Rajput case.

Women Advocates Move To Supreme Court Against the Delhi HC Orders on Resuming Physical Hearing

Another writ petition has been filed by women advocates in the Supreme Court against the decision of the Delhi HC of directing the expansion of physical hearing of cases within the National Capital Territory of Delhi without giving an option to litigants to be represented by their lawyers virtually.

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

[WhatsApp Privacy Policy Row] It’s a Private App, Don’t Use It; Says Delhi High Court

On Monday, while hearing a petition regarding the privacy policy of WhatsApp, the Delhi High Court said, “It is a private app. Don't join it. It is a voluntary thing, don't accept it. Use some other app.”

Madras High Court Asks the State To Reconsider Number of Seats Allotted for Bcm Category

Mr. Shakkiya filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Indian Constitution to issue a Writ of Mandamus. The petition sought to direct...

Gujarat High Court Directs To Register Name of Petitioners in the Society Records as Owners of Property, as per Will

A single-judge bench of Gujarat High Court consisting of Honourable Justice Biren Vaishnav, because probate wasn’t necessary and that the petitioners were entitled to...

If No Complaint Is Filed, No Further Orders Are Required To Be Passed: Telangana High Court

Excerpt In Matlakunta Sundaramma vs The State Of Telangana, on January 8, 2021, the Telangana High Court decided that there is no requirement of passing...

Gujarat High Court Allows Report Filed by Official Liquidator for Dissolution of the Company

The present report had been filed by the Official Liquidator for the dissolution of M/s AtRo Limited under the provisions of Section 497 (6)...

Parents of Road Accident Victim Entitled To Compensation: Delhi High Court

Justice JR Midha said, “Even if parents are not dependent on their children at the time of an accident, they will certainly be dependent, both financially and emotionally, upon them at the later stage of their life, as the children were dependent upon their parents in their initial years.”

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -