Delhi University Slammed For Laches In Granting Gold Medals By Delhi High Court

Must Read

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi,...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Follow us

One of the oldest educational institutes in the country has been slammed by the Delhi High Court for a major lapse in accolading a student with a gold medal in Sociology.

Facts Of The Case

Majumdar a student of Delhi School of Economics completed her MA(Sociology) from Department of Sociology in August 2014. In a writ petition filed by her, she submitted that result of the 2014 MA (Sociology) was initially declared on 2 June 2014, according to which one Sophia Zehra Abbas has scored 977 marks out of 1,600 marks. In the same list, the result of a lot of other students including Majumdar was shown as result later. Afterwards on 6th August 2014 result of remaining students of the same batch was declared by way of which Majumdar was declared to have secured 999 marks out of 1,600. As per the results, Majumdar had scored the highest marks but on 23rd February 2015 provisional list circulated by varsity did not include Majumdar’s name. In the annual convocation of DU, gold medal for Sociology was awarded to Abbas, who was actually the 4th rank holder.

Feeling wronged by this decision of the university, Majumdar made various representation to the authorities of Delhi University which included not only the Deputy Controller of Examination but also the Vice Chancellor of Delhi University. Her voice fell on deaf ears and she could not get any relief. Petition further contended that Majumdar’s father received a letter from Dean (Examination), Delhi University informing him that the name of awardees had been published on the official website of the varsity and since no objection or representation of any kind had been received from the department or from any other student, the University is justified in awarding the gold medal to Abbas.

The Decision Of The Court

After listening to both the sides and examining the evidence presented, Justice Rekha Palli instructed Delhi University to award the Kunda Datar Gold Medal for 2012-2014 batch to Pratichi Majumdar who had obtained 999 marks out of 1,600. Her score was the highest score in her batch. Counsel on behalf of Delhi University objected that Majumdar took an exorbitant time of eight months in approaching the court to highlight the errors of the university and this barred her from obtaining any relief. Court answering to the argument of respondents said that objection is wholly meritless and delay of eight months cannot be treated as laches on part of petitioner. The judge further said that

“Even otherwise, the respondents, having failed to discharge their duties in the manner expected of them, a meritorious student like the petitioner cannot be deprived of the Gold Medal which she deserves. For the aforesaid reasons, the writ petition is allowed and respondents (DU and others) are directed to immediately award the Kunda Datar Gold Medal to the petitioner,”

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Inordinate and Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation by Government Renders Detention Order Illegal: Madras High Court

A Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed in the Madras High Court to declare the detention order of the husband of...

Supreme Court Asks Petitioner to Approach Bombay High Court in PIL for CBI Probe in Disha Salian Case

On the 26th of October 2020, the Apex Court heard the PIL praying for a CBI probe into the death of Disha Salian. The...

Privy Council Clarifies Approach To Winding up in “Deadlock” Cases in the Case of Chu v. Lau

The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council clarified several aspects of the law concerning just and equitable winding-up petitions, as well as shareholder disputes...

Madras High Court Directs Hospital To Submit Necessary Medical Reports to Authorization Committee for Approval of Kidney Transplant

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a Writ of Mandamus to K.G. Hospital, Coimbatore by P. Sankar & V. Sobana....

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -