Delhi High Court Stays NLU Delhi’s 50% Reservation for Delhi Students

Must Read

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court...

Follow us

A Division Bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Subramonium Prasad stayed the decision of reservation in the case of Pia Singh v. NLU Delhi.

Brief Facts of the Case

A writ petition was filed in Delhi HC by a 24-year-old student, Pia Singh. She belonged to the General/Unserved category. She was also a permanent resident of Delhi. The petitioner aspired to pursue her LL.M. from NLU Delhi. But the reservation policy affected her chances of selection and future career prospects.

This petition was filed against the reservation policy opted by the NLU, Delhi. In her petition, she sought quashing of the provision of a 50% reservation to students who passed their qualifying exam from an institute located in Delhi. She submitted that this reservation policy was against the constitutional mandate under Art. 15(3). Also is also against all reasonable and logical norms.

The petitioner submitted that there was no object behind this classification. Furthermore, providing a 22% reservation to OBC and a 10% reservation to the EWS category without increasing the total number of seats was also unconstitutional. At the same time, it was against the mandate of guidelines issued by MHRD.

On 02.03.2020 the respondent released an e-prospectus for the UG and PG courses for the Academic year 2020-21. The last date for the submission of the application was 15th May 2020.

The Petitioner said that, “It is apparent by analyzing seat matrix of both academic year that in the previous year seats for unreserved category was 64 but in this academic year only 30 seats were notified for unreserved category. Hence, NLU Delhi has grossly violated the guidelines issued by MHRD and reservation for OBC & EWS were implemented without increasing the seats.”

The Decision of the Last Hearing

The same Division Bench was hearing the petition filed by three NLU Delhi students. This was filed against the same reservation policy. In the case of Balvinder Sangwan and Ors. vs GNCT of Delhi and Ors., the Delhi Government had argued that NLU Delhi was not a Central University or a National Institute of Excellence. It was only a State University which came into existence on the basis of the Act enacted by the Delhi legislature.

The Delhi Government also stated that the reservation policy was in accordance with the NLU Delhi statute. It was in consonance with Article 41 of the Constitution. It was also protected by several judgments of the Supreme Court.

Court’s Order

The Court observed that the petitioners challenging the reservation had made a prima facie case for a stay on the move. The Court stayed on the decision of NLU Delhi introducing
250% horizontal reservation. The Court ordered the University to maintain the status quo of admission w.r.t. to LLB and LLM admissions. The Court further directed NLU Delhi to issue
a fresh admission notification on or before July 2. One week’s period was also granted for students to apply for the same if interested.

The matter is enlisted on August 18.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News,InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Calcutta High Court Rejects the Petition Challenging the Bid’s Rejection Filed on Seeking Condonation of Delay Due to Pandemic Interventions in Absence of Satisfactory...

Case: Shiba Prosad Banerjee vs The State of West Bengal and others The Hon’ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya of Calcutta High Court on 22nd January...

Calcutta High Court Reiterated the Scope of the Grounds for Exercising Its Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction.

Case: Shreya Beria vs Vedant Bhagat The Calcutta HC on 20th January 2021, dismissed the criminal revision filed by the Petitioners (wife) challenging the...

Calcutta High Court: Deceased’s Wife Has the Sole Right Over His Preserved Sperm; Father Doesn’t Have Any Fundamental Right Over Son’s Progeny Without the...

Case: Asok Kumar Chatterjee vs. The Union of India & Ors. The Calcutta High Court dismissed the petition by the Petitioner (father) on 19th...

Gujarat High Court Allows a Family Suit to Be Transferred From Family Court, Surat to the Family Court, Bhavnagar

The Court directed that in light of the circumstances of the present case, the application of the applicant- wife to transfer the case from...

Telangana HC Grants Two Days to Convey the Decision of Appropriate Notification and Counselling to the Higher Secondary Department

Excerpt In Telangana Republican Party Trp vs The State Of Telangana, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed the Higher Education Department for passing...

Telangana HC: Applications Have to Be Made Through Online Web Portal “Dharani” for Mutation of Names

Excerpt In P. Manohar Reddy vs The State Of Telangana And 3 Others, on 18 January 2021, Telangana High Court directed that one has to...

Indonesian Spa Therapist Approaches Supreme Court Regarding Illegal Detention Followed by Raid at the Spa

An Indonesian spa therapist has moved to Supreme Court, whilst challenging an HC order which provided relief to the police inspector who was involved in the illegal detention of the spa therapist in a woman’s home which was followed by a police raid at the spa.

Questions of Forgery, Tampering Not Capable of Summary Adjudication Under Article 226 in Delhi High Court’s Jee Marks Case

Questions of fraud, forgery, and tampering require elaborate evidence as per the ruling of the Delhi High Court making it incapable of summary adjudication...

Supreme Court: Urgent and Immediate Reforms Needed in the Legal Education Due To Mushrooming of Law Schools

The Supreme Court, on Saturday, said that there is an urgent need for reforming the legal education in the country as its quality is being affected due to the ‘mushrooming’ of Law Colleges.

Delhi High Court Ruled Disclosure of Interest in Information Sought Under Rti Act Necessary to Establish Bonafides of Applicant

The Delhi HC opined that disclosure of the interest of information is necessary for the information sought under the RTI Act for establishing bonafide...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -