Delhi High Court Rejects Plea Challenging the Suspension of Ashok Arora

Must Read

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration,...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be...

Follow us

In the case of Ashok Arora v. Supreme Court Bar Association and Anr., The High Court of Delhi rejected a Plea moved by Advocate Ashok Arora on Oct 6. The Plea Challenged the decision of the Executive Committee of the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) suspending him from the post of Secretary.

Facts of the Case

SCBA suspended its Secretary Ashok Arora on May 8. The suspension came a day after Arora had called an Emergent General Meeting (EGM) of the lawyers’ body on May 11. In order to discuss the agenda for removing Senior Advocate Dushyant Dave from the post of SCBA, President Arora had alleged that Dave is using the office of SCBA for political purposes. But The Executive Committee (EC) cancelled the proposed EGM. And decided to set up a three-member panel to look into the allegations against Arora.

Hence, Ashok Arora filed a suit challenging his suspension on the ground that his removal by EC of SCBA was in violation of principles of natural justice.

Arguments Before the Court

Advocate Ashok Arora argued that as per Rule 35, the power to suspend or expel a member rested with the General House of SCBA. And the same has to be decided, after an inquiry into a complaint of misconduct, is carried out by a committee. Arora further submitted that his removal by EC was in violation of natural justice.

Senior Advocate Arvind Nigam appeared for SCBA. He contended that the Petitioner’s reliance on Rule 35 was misplaced. As it only dealt with the issue of removal of a member. SCBA further informed that there have been past precedents on the practice of suspending elected members from SCBA posts under Rule 14.

It was also stated that all principles of natural justice were followed in the meeting of the EC. As not only did the President recuse from the deliberations, but the Petitioner was also given the chance to present his views and counter-views.

Court’s Order

The Single Bench of Justice Mukta Gupta noted that Ashok Arora failed to establish a prima facie case in his favour. The Court further refused to stay the removal of Ashok Arora from the post of Secretary.

For the original order of the case click here.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgment from courts. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can subscribe to our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Himachal Pradesh High Court Supports Promotion Based on Seniority of Post Rather Based on the Eligibility Test

In the case of Ramesh Chand Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Others, the petitioner, reached the court as he was aggrieved by the...

NCDRC Dismisses PIL against Urologist, Holy Family Hospital, Says Mode Of Treatment Or Skill Differs From Doctor To Doctor

The National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a petition against Holy Family Hospital and a Urologist, alleging negligence in diagnosing the septicemia and...

Himachal Pradesh High Court Disposes Suit for Possession and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction Due To Mutual Consent

In the case of Parveen Kumar vs Smt. Vijay Laxmi and Ors, the Petitioner, Parveen had filed a suit for declaration, possession and a permanent prohibitory...

Supreme Court Appoints Committee To Examine Arbitrariness of Sealing of Resorts in Elephant Corridor, Tamil Nadu

A Full Bench headed by the Chief Justice of India, in the matter of Hospitality Association of Mudumalai V. In Defence of Environment and Animals...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Rules That Export Ban on N95 Masks & PPE Kits Does Not Violate Fundamental Right of Traders

The Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the formulation and regulation of trade policies were within the subjects of the Central Government. Any reasonable...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice To Two Pleas Filed Praying for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage

The Court heard two writ petitions which urged that the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act be interpreted to also apply to...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Allahabad High Court Order Granting Interim Bail on Medical Grounds

An appeal was filed before the Supreme Court, challenging the Judgment & Order of the Allahabad High Court in the matter of State of U.P...

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Lawyers and Legal Clerks To Travel in Local Trains

The present hearing arose out of a batch of Public Interest Litigations that was filed in the Bombay High Court to permit the members...

Provisions for Retirement of Teachers Must Be Read With the Larger Interest of Students in Mind: Supreme Court

Supreme Court in Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal v State of Uttarakhand reinstated the appellants to their position as Professor on basis of re-employment till the...

Parties Cannot Deny Specific Performance Merely Due To Delay: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court, in Ferrodous Estate v P Gopirathnam, revisited the law on the specific performance of a contract. It reiterated that mere delay...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -