Delhi High Court Denies Bail in the Matter of Fake Currency Notes

Must Read

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found...

Follow us

A network of Fake Indian Currency Note (FICN) got busted by Delhi Special Cell in December 2019. For this scam, five People got arrested on charges of being part of this gang. Subsequently, one of the accused Unwan Amrohi approached the High Court of Delhi. He filed an instant bail application which, however, got dismissed in the end.

Facts of the case

The petitioner, Unwan Amrohi is a Delhi University commerce graduate. He works as a web engineer. The police arrested him for converting the fake currency for Bitcoins with 4 others. It recovered FICN with a face value of Rs 54.9 lakh and fake US Dollars with a face value of Rs 1.73 crore from them. The police charged them under Sections 489-A/489-D/120-B/34 IPC & Section 25 of the Arms Act.

Petitioner’s Arguments

Mr Sudhir Nandrajog, the learned senior counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner. He submits that police took petitioner for five days remand. However, during the period, they found nothing from the possession of the petitioner. Thus, the recovery shown by police officials has certain flaws.

He claims that the alleged recovery is photocopying on normal daily use papers. Also, more than 70% of the copies of currency notes are single side photocopies. Moreover, all the copies are with the same serial number.  

Mr Sudhir claims that the petitioner has neither designed nor printed any FICN. All the alleged recovered photocopies of currency notes are normal xerox copies. It is from the general photocopy machine and isn’t from any printing machine. Thus, the petitioner is not connected with the co-accused.

Respondent’s Arguments

Mr Izhar Ahmad, the learned APP for state opposed the present petition. He submits that he got secret clues. It states that Asif, who is in Dubai, is managing the network of pumping FICN in India through Unwan and others.

Learned APP states that FICN, fake US currency notes were received in a secret search. Also, illegal arm and ammunitions were recovered from his house. Moreover, the investigation revealed that the petitioner was himself printing the fake currency notes. He also used them for deception.

Mr Ahmad further relied on the judgment pronounced by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of the State of Gujarat vs. Mohan Lal Jitamalji Porwal & Ors. (1987) 2 SCC 364 and Y.S. Jangan Mohan Reddy vs. CBI (2013) 7 SCC 439.

Court’s Decision

The Court observed that

  1. Economic offences are required to be treated as a separate class. Thus, bail cannot be granted as a matter of routine.
  2. Massive amounts of FICN, FUSCN, printers, arms, and other materials were recovered.
  3. The prosecution has revealed that FICN and F(US)CN were printed on both sides as evidence. It isn’t on single side printed notes as the petitioner mentioned.

Hence, Single Bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait dismissed the petition on July 16.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Federal Court Denied Involvement of US Department of Justice in Trump’s Defamation Lawsuit

Background  The Plaintiff, E .Jean Carroll, published a book where she wrote that a businessman, Donald J Trump had raped her in a dressing room,...

SC Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

Lawsuit Filed Against Uber for Discriminatory “Star Rating System”

The lawsuit was bought in the District Court of North California against Uber. The plaintiff claims class-action status on behalf of all the minority...

Bombay High Court To Hear Plea Seeking Removal of Chairperson of National Commission for Women

A Writ Petition had been filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the conduct of the Chairperson of the National Commission for Women. The...

Bombay High Court Passes Order To Clarify and Modify Previous Order When State of Maharashtra Moved Praecipe

Division Bench of Bombay High Court consisting of Justice S. V. Gangapurwala and Justice Shrikant D. Kulkarni had passed an Order on 25th October...

The European Court of Human Rights Orders Germany To Pay Non-Pecuniary Damages for Prison Strip-Searches 

A serving German prisoner was repeatedly stripped searched for non-legitimate purposes. The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) found that Germany had violated the...

Lack of Independent Witness Doesn’t Vitiate Conviction: Supreme Court

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court in Rajesh Dhiman v State of Himachal Pradesh clarified the law in case of lack of independent...

Madras High Court Observes Unexplained Delay in Procedural Safeguards, Quashes Detention Through Writ Petition

A Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus. The petitioner P. Lakshmi, called for records of the...

UK Court of Appeal Rules Home Department’s Deportation Policy of Immigrants Unlawful

Britain’s Court of Appeal quashed the Home Department’s deportation policy, declaring it unlawful; criticizing it for being too stringent on immigrants to comply with. Background The...

Supreme Court Stays Order Restraining Physical Campaigns in the Madhya Pradesh Bye-Elections

On the 26th of October, a Bench was set up which comprised Justice AM Khanwilkar, Justice Dinesh Maheshwari, and Justice Sanjiv Khanna. They heard...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -