Delhi High Court: Petition Moved To Seek Directions For The Treatment of Non-COVID Patients In Hospitals

Must Read

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and...

Follow us

The present writ petition (Yash Aggarwal & Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.) has been moved by the Petitioners, Yash Aggarwal and Chitrakshi, in front of the Delhi High Court on 13th April 2020, for enforcement of the rights of the citizens under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

The petition pleas to seek a direction to be issued by the Respondents to all the Hospitals to provide proper treatment to the parties suffering from any disease, illness or injury other than COVID-19 and also make available the facilities of OPD and other necessities to all the patients, along with patients suffering from COVID-19. 

The respondents in the instant petition are the governing body for the Government Hospitals in the National Capital Region of Delhi, and the Registration Body of Doctors with recognised qualifications in India. 

Petitioner’s Submissions

The petitioner argues that due to the Lockdown, many OPDs has been shut down for all illnesses other than COVID-19 and the patients are denied from consulting their doctors or get the necessary treatments. Moreover, the patients suffering from chronic diseases and those who need necessary facilities are not given treatment in both private and government hospitals, as many hospitals are only treating patients suffering from COVID-19 and the other hospitals are afraid to treat the patients thinking they might be carrying the virus. 

The petitioner, in order to emphasise upon their argument, points out that one patient namely Ashok Kumar aged about 61 years, was advised by his doctor to get Dialysis thrice a week at Mool Chand Hospital. However, during the lockdown, the said hospital did not carry out the Dialysis and the patient had to get it done in another hospital located 20 km away from his house. Similarly, a patient who had suffered kidney failure and the spinal problem was advised to get Dialysis twice a week, however, when he approached the hospital where he used to get the Dialysis done, the said hospital asked him to go to another one.

The petitioner further argues that cancer, as well as psychiatric patients, are majorly affected due to the non-treatment in hospitals. The petitioner has emphasised upon the point by stating that “in case the facilities are not made to facilitate and continue treatment for people with psychiatric illness, it could lead to humanitarian crisis.” Cancer patients are also facing a huge crisis as various hospitals are rejecting the treatment for cancer, including the patients’ chemotherapy. 

The petitioner further state that admission in hospitals such as Indian Institute of Allied Science, All India Institute of Medical Science (AIIMS) and Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital has considerably reduced after the outbreak of COVID-19. The petitioner also highlights the fact that various hospitals are not letting patients, with high body temperature, into the premises of the hospital.  

The petitioner is anticipating to seek the indulgence of the Court to give direction to the Government and Indian Medical Council to take necessary action to treat the patients suffering from illnesses, diseases and injuries other than COVID-19, and also direct the Hospitals, both Government as well as private, and Doctors to run their clinics as it is an essential life-saving service.


Libertatem.in is now on Telegram. Follow us for regular legal updates and judgements from the court. Follow us on Google News, InstagramLinkedInFacebook & Twitter. You can also subscribe for our Weekly Email Updates. You can also contribute stories like this and help us spread awareness for a better society. Submit Your Post Now.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Latest News

Punjab Woman Evokes Petition for Protection Fearing Honour Killing

In the case of Divya Mattu and another vs State of Punjab and others, the petitioner, Divya, fearing honour killing against her by her...

Punjab Woman Accuses Punjab Police of Keeping Husband in Illegal Custody and Framing Him in a False Case

In the case of Geeta v the State of Punjab, the petitioner evoked a writ petition of habeas corpus as she claimed that her...

Addition of Words as Prefixes or Suffixes Is an Infringement of a Registered Trademark: Delhi High Court

Justice Jayanth Nath allowed the Times Group to use its registered trademark “Newshour”, in the case of Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd v. ARG Outlier...

Just Because the Deceased Did Not Have License, Does Not Imply He Was Negligent: Chhattisgarh High Court

In the case of Hemlal & Others v. Dayaram & Others, a Single Bench of Chhattisgarh High Court consisting of Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal annunciated various...

Hoardings Are Movable Property Under Section 2(3) of DMC Act Subject To the Twin Test: Delhi High Court

Delhi High Court in the case of Delhi International Airport v South Delhi Metropolitan Corporation discussed in detail the provision under Section 2(3) of the DMC...

State Cannot Issue Directions on Rate of Charge of Non-COVID Patients in Private Hospitals: Bombay High Court

On 23rd October 2020, the Nagpur Bench of Bombay High court at Nagpur, consisting of Justice R.K. Deshpande and Justice Pushpa V. Ganediwala gave...

UAPA Cannot Be Used When the Accused Does Not Have an Active Knowledge of the Offence: Delhi High Court

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait held that the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act cannot be charged on the accused when he does not have any knowledge...

US Court Orders Iran To Pay $1.4 BN in Damages To Missing Former FBI Agent’s Family

The United States District Court for the District of Columbia ordered Iran to pay in total $1.45 bn to the Levinson family in punitive...

Onus on Petitioner To Show Unassailable Facts: Delhi High Court

In the case of Rhythm Jain v National Testing Agency, the Delhi High Court mentioned that in such petitions the onus to prove the facts...

Under-Trial/Convicted Persons Do Not Have Absolute Right To Parole in Light of Coronavirus : Bombay High Court

An important judgment was given by the Division Bench of the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court concerning the constitutionality of Rule 19 of...

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -